Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Ecology. 2011 Dec;92(12):2248-57. doi: 10.1890/11-0363.1.
Plant species introduced into novel ranges may become invasive due to evolutionary change, phenotypic plasticity, or other biotic or abiotic mechanisms. Evolution of introduced populations could be the result of founder effects, drift, hybridization, or adaptation to local conditions, which could enhance the invasiveness of introduced species. However, understanding whether the success of invading populations is due to genetic differences between native and introduced populations may be obscured by origin x environment interactions. That is, studies conducted under a limited set of environmental conditions may show inconsistent results if native or introduced populations are differentially adapted to specific conditions. We tested for genetic differences between native and introduced populations, and for origin x environment interactions, between native (China) and introduced (U.S.) populations of the invasive annual grass Microstegium vimineum (stiltgrass) across 22 common gardens spanning a wide range of habitats and environmental conditions. On average, introduced populations produced 46% greater biomass and had 7.4% greater survival, and outperformed native range populations in every common garden. However, we found no evidence that introduced Microstegium exhibited greater phenotypic plasticity than native populations. Biomass of Microstegium was positively correlated with light and resident community richness and biomass across the common gardens. However, these relationships were equivalent for native and introduced populations, suggesting that the greater mean performance of introduced populations is not due to unequal responses to specific environmental parameters. Our data on performance of invasive and native populations suggest that post-introduction evolutionary changes may have enhanced the invasive potential of this species. Further, the ability of Microstegium to survive and grow across the wide variety of environmental conditions demonstrates that few habitats are immune to invasion.
引入新栖息地的植物物种可能由于进化改变、表型可塑性或其他生物或非生物机制而成为入侵物种。引入种群的进化可能是奠基者效应、漂变、杂交或适应本地条件的结果,这可能会增强引入物种的入侵性。然而,了解入侵种群的成功是否归因于本地和引入种群之间的遗传差异,可能会因起源与环境的相互作用而变得模糊不清。也就是说,如果本地或引入种群对特定条件有不同的适应,那么在有限的环境条件下进行的研究可能会得出不一致的结果。我们测试了入侵一年生草本植物微齿芒(stiltgrass)的本地(中国)和引入(美国)种群之间的遗传差异,以及起源与环境的相互作用,跨越了 22 个常见的花园,涵盖了广泛的栖息地和环境条件。平均而言,引入种群的生物量增加了 46%,存活率提高了 7.4%,在每个常见花园中都优于本地种群。然而,我们没有发现引入的微齿芒表现出比本地种群更大的表型可塑性的证据。微齿芒的生物量与光照和本地群落丰富度和生物量呈正相关,在常见花园中均如此。然而,这些关系对于本地和引入种群都是等效的,这表明引入种群的平均表现更好并不是由于对特定环境参数的响应不均等所致。我们关于入侵和本地种群表现的数据表明,引入后的进化变化可能增强了该物种的入侵潜力。此外,微齿芒在广泛的环境条件下生存和生长的能力表明,很少有栖息地能免受入侵。