Suppr超能文献

听者效应对韵律对比(升调)产生的影响(L)。

Effects of seeing the interlocutor on the production of prosodic contrasts (L).

机构信息

MARCS Auditory Laboratories, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, New South Wales, 2751, Australia.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Feb;131(2):1011-4. doi: 10.1121/1.3676605.

Abstract

This study investigated whether the production of prosodic focus and phrasing contrasts was modified when interlocutors could only hear each other [auditory only (AO)], compared to when they could hear and see each other [face to face (FTF)]. The prosodic characteristics of utterances produced by six talkers were examined using both acoustic and perceptual measures (ratings of the degree of focus or clarity of the statement-question contrast). The acoustic measures showed a range of differences between narrow focus and between phrasing contrasts and some of these differences were greater in the AO setting than the FTF one. The listener's ratings of focus and phrasing showed a clear difference between the AO and FTF conditions, with perceptual attributes of both narrow focus and echoic question phrasing being rated as clearer in the AO condition. To explain these results it is proposed that talkers compensate for the lack of visual prosodic cues in the AO condition by taking extra care (relative to FTF conditions) to ensure the effective transmission of prosodic cues.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在只有听觉输入(AO)而不是听觉-视觉输入(FTF)的情况下,对话者的韵律重音和韵律短语对比的产生是否会发生变化。使用声学和感知测量(对陈述-疑问对比的焦点或清晰度的评分)来检查六位说话者所产生的话语的韵律特征。声学测量显示出窄重音和韵律短语对比之间的一系列差异,其中一些差异在 AO 环境中比 FTF 环境更大。听众对焦点和韵律短语的评分在 AO 和 FTF 条件之间有明显差异,在 AO 条件下,窄重音和回声问句韵律的感知属性都被评为更清晰。为了解释这些结果,提出说话者通过比 FTF 条件更额外注意(相对于 FTF 条件)来补偿 AO 条件下视觉韵律线索的缺乏,以确保韵律线索的有效传递。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验