Puncher M, Birchall A, Bull R K
Radiation Protection Division, HPA Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0RQ, UK.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Aug;151(2):224-36. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr475. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
Estimating uncertainties on doses from bioassay data is of interest in epidemiology studies that estimate cancer risk from occupational exposures to radionuclides. Bayesian methods provide a logical framework to calculate these uncertainties. However, occupational exposures often consist of many intakes, and this can make the Bayesian calculation computationally intractable. This paper describes a novel strategy for increasing the computational speed of the calculation by simplifying the intake pattern to a single composite intake, termed as complex intake regime (CIR). In order to assess whether this approximation is accurate and fast enough for practical purposes, the method is implemented by the Weighted Likelihood Monte Carlo Sampling (WeLMoS) method and evaluated by comparing its performance with a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. The MCMC method gives the full solution (all intakes are independent), but is very computationally intensive to apply routinely. Posterior distributions of model parameter values, intakes and doses are calculated for a representative sample of plutonium workers from the United Kingdom Atomic Energy cohort using the WeLMoS method with the CIR and the MCMC method. The distributions are in good agreement: posterior means and Q(0.025) and Q(0.975) quantiles are typically within 20 %. Furthermore, the WeLMoS method using the CIR converges quickly: a typical case history takes around 10-20 min on a fast workstation, whereas the MCMC method took around 12-72 hr. The advantages and disadvantages of the method are discussed.
在通过职业性放射性核素暴露估算癌症风险的流行病学研究中,估算生物测定数据剂量的不确定性很有意义。贝叶斯方法提供了一个计算这些不确定性的逻辑框架。然而,职业暴露通常包含多次摄入,这可能使贝叶斯计算在计算上难以处理。本文描述了一种新策略,通过将摄入模式简化为单一复合摄入(称为复杂摄入模式,CIR)来提高计算速度。为了评估这种近似对于实际目的是否足够准确和快速,该方法通过加权似然蒙特卡罗抽样(WeLMoS)方法实现,并通过将其性能与马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)方法进行比较来评估。MCMC方法给出完整解(所有摄入都是独立的),但常规应用时计算量非常大。使用带有CIR的WeLMoS方法和MCMC方法,为来自英国原子能队列的钚工人代表性样本计算模型参数值、摄入量和剂量的后验分布。这些分布吻合良好:后验均值以及Q(0.025)和Q(0.975)分位数通常在20%以内。此外,使用CIR的WeLMoS方法收敛很快:在快速工作站上,一个典型病例大约需要10 - 20分钟,而MCMC方法大约需要12 - 72小时。本文还讨论了该方法的优缺点。