Suppr超能文献

人类和孔雀鱼中存在两个类似的数字系统的证据。

Evidence for two numerical systems that are similar in humans and guppies.

机构信息

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031923. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Humans and non-human animals share an approximate non-verbal system for representing and comparing numerosities that has no upper limit and for which accuracy is dependent on the numerical ratio. Current evidence indicates that the mechanism for keeping track of individual objects can also be used for numerical purposes; if so, its accuracy will be independent of numerical ratio, but its capacity is limited to the number of items that can be tracked, about four. There is, however, growing controversy as to whether two separate number systems are present in other vertebrate species.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this study, we compared the ability of undergraduate students and guppies to discriminate the same numerical ratios, both within and beyond the small number range. In both students and fish the performance was ratio-independent for the numbers 1-4, while it steadily increased with numerical distance when larger numbers were presented.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that two distinct systems underlie quantity discrimination in both humans and fish, implying that the building blocks of uniquely human mathematical abilities may be evolutionarily ancient, dating back to before the divergence of bony fish and tetrapod lineages.

摘要

背景

人类和非人类动物共享一种近似的非语言系统,用于表示和比较数量,这个系统没有上限,并且其准确性取决于数量比。目前的证据表明,用于跟踪单个物体的机制也可以用于数字目的;如果是这样,其准确性将独立于数量比,但它的容量限于可以跟踪的项目数量,大约为四个。然而,关于其他脊椎动物是否存在两个独立的数量系统,存在越来越多的争议。

方法/主要发现:在这项研究中,我们比较了大学生和孔雀鱼辨别相同数量比的能力,包括在小数量范围内和超出小数量范围的情况。在学生和鱼类中,数量 1-4 的表现与数量比无关,而当呈现更大的数量时,表现则随着数量距离的增加而稳定增加。

结论/意义:我们的结果表明,数量辨别在人类和鱼类中都有两个不同的系统,这意味着独特的人类数学能力的构建块可能是古老的,可追溯到骨鱼和四足动物谱系分化之前。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验