• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 Seeplex HPV4A ACE 和 Cervista HPV 检测法在杂交捕获 2 阳性检测物中 HPV 的检测效果。

Comparison of the Seeplex HPV4A ACE and the Cervista HPV assays for the detection of HPV in hybrid capture 2 positive media.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jan;23(1):5-10. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2012.23.1.5. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

DOI:10.3802/jgo.2012.23.1.5
PMID:22355460
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3280067/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate the efficacy of Seeplex HPV4A ACE for the detection of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV 16 and/or HPV 18 genotypes as compared to the PCR method and the Cervista HPV assays in cervical swab samples.

METHODS

Besides liquid-based cytology, additional 97 cervical swab samples were collected for HPV genotyping by HPV4A ACE, Cervista HPV assays, and PCR method. To check the statistical differences, we also conducted the paired proportion test, Cohen's κ statistic, and a receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Seeplex HPV4A ACE and the Cervista HPV HR showed substantial agreement with PCR for detection of HR HPVs (88.3%, κ=0.767 and 81.7%, κ=0.636, respectively). Seeplex HPV4A ACE also showed substantial agreement with the Cervista HPV 16/18 test (89.5%, κ=0.628). Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of Seeplex HPV4A ACE and Cervista HPV HR were 91.4% vs. 84.5% and 73.4%, vs. 72.7%, respectively, when those higher than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were regarded as abnormalities. HPV genotyping for HPV 16/18 detected cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs) better than HR HPV tests (66.7% vs. 24.6% by HPV4A ACE, 52.6% vs. 25.9% by Cervista HPV assays in CIN II or more, relatively).

CONCLUSION

Seeplex HPV4A ACE is an effective method as the PCR and the Cervista HPV assays for the detection of HR HPVs and for genotyping of HPV 16 and 18.

摘要

目的

与 PCR 方法和 Cervista HPV 检测相比,验证 Seeplex HPV4A ACE 检测高危型(HR)人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)和 HPV16 和/或 HPV18 基因型的疗效,用于宫颈拭子样本。

方法

除了液基细胞学检查外,还收集了另外 97 例宫颈拭子样本,用于 HPV4A ACE、Cervista HPV 检测和 PCR 方法进行 HPV 基因分型。为了检查统计学差异,我们还进行了配对比例检验、Cohen's κ 统计和受试者工作特征曲线。

结果

Seeplex HPV4A ACE 和 Cervista HPV HR 与 PCR 检测 HR HPV 具有实质性一致性(88.3%,κ=0.767 和 81.7%,κ=0.636)。Seeplex HPV4A ACE 与 Cervista HPV 16/18 检测也具有实质性一致性(89.5%,κ=0.628)。此外,当将高于低级别鳞状上皮内病变视为异常时,Seeplex HPV4A ACE 和 Cervista HPV HR 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 91.4%和 84.5%和 73.4%和 72.7%。HPV16/18 基因分型检测 CIN 优于 HR HPV 检测(HPV4A ACE 为 66.7%,Cervista HPV 检测为 52.6%,CIN II 或更高级别为 24.6%和 25.9%)。

结论

Seeplex HPV4A ACE 是一种有效的方法,与 PCR 和 Cervista HPV 检测一样,可用于检测 HR HPV 并对 HPV16 和 18 进行基因分型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b76/3280067/86832c4099c0/jgo-23-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b76/3280067/86832c4099c0/jgo-23-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b76/3280067/86832c4099c0/jgo-23-5-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Seeplex HPV4A ACE and the Cervista HPV assays for the detection of HPV in hybrid capture 2 positive media.比较 Seeplex HPV4A ACE 和 Cervista HPV 检测法在杂交捕获 2 阳性检测物中 HPV 的检测效果。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jan;23(1):5-10. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2012.23.1.5. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
2
Comparison of the Cobas 4800 HPV test and the Seeplex HPV4A ACE with the hybrid capture 2 test.Cobas 4800 HPV 检测与 Seeplex HPV4A ACE 检测与杂交捕获 2 检测的比较。
Int J Med Sci. 2013;10(2):119-23. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5460. Epub 2012 Dec 30.
3
Triage of women with negative cytology and positive high-risk HPV: an analysis of data from the SHENCCAST II/III studies.细胞学检查阴性但高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测呈阳性的女性的分诊:来自SHENCCAST II/III研究的数据分析
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014 Apr;18(2):122-7. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31829f2171.
4
Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.在荷兰筛查人群中比较Cervista HPV HR检测与杂交捕获2检测:通过改变临界值提高Cervista HPV HR检测的特异性
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 22;9(7):e101930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101930. eCollection 2014.
5
Cost-effectiveness and accuracy of cervical cancer screening with a high-risk HPV genotyping assay vs a nongenotyping assay in China: an observational cohort study.中国高危型人乳头瘤病毒基因分型检测与非基因分型检测用于宫颈癌筛查的成本效益及准确性:一项观察性队列研究
Cancer Cell Int. 2020 Aug 28;20:421. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01512-4. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparison of the novel human papillomavirus 4 auto-capillary electrophoresis test with the hybrid capture 2 assay and with the PCR HPV typing set test in the detection of high-risk HPV including HPV 16 and 18 genotypes in cervical specimens.新型人乳头瘤病毒4型自动毛细管电泳检测法与杂交捕获2检测法及聚合酶链反应人乳头瘤病毒分型检测法在宫颈标本中检测包括16型和18型基因型在内的高危人乳头瘤病毒的比较。
J Korean Med Sci. 2009 Aug;24(4):579-84. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.579. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
7
High-risk human papillomavirus detection in women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or higher-grade cytology using the Cervista HPV HR test.采用 Cervista HPV HR 检测对低级别鳞状上皮内病变或高级别细胞学患者进行高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013 Jan;17(1):51-7. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31824ddbe0.
8
Clinical experience with the Cervista HPV HR assay: correlation of cytology and HPV status from 56,501 specimens.Cervista HPV HR 检测的临床应用:56501 例标本的细胞学和 HPV 状态相关性。
J Mol Diagn. 2011 Mar;13(2):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.11.016.
9
Can HPV Test on Random Urine Replace Self-HPV Test on Vaginal Self-Samples or Clinician-Collected Cervical Samples?随机尿液中的人乳头瘤病毒检测能否替代阴道自我采样或临床医生采集的宫颈样本的自我人乳头瘤病毒检测?
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Sep 11;15:1421-1429. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S416520. eCollection 2023.
10
Incorporation of Cervista Human Papillomavirus 16/18 Assay Into Algorithms for Classifying Human Papillomavirus Status in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma Specimens.将 Cervista 人乳头瘤病毒 16/18 检测试剂盒纳入用于分类福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋头颈部鳞状细胞癌标本中人乳头瘤病毒状态的算法中。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Mar;143(3):356-361. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0469-OA. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the PANArray HPV Genotyping Chip Test with the Cobas 4800 HPV and Hybrid Capture 2 Tests for Detection of HPV in ASCUS Women.用于检测非典型鳞状细胞意义不明确(ASCUS)女性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的PANArray HPV基因分型芯片检测与Cobas 4800 HPV检测及杂交捕获2检测的比较
Yonsei Med J. 2018 Jul;59(5):662-668. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.5.662.
2
Type-specific persistence or regression of human papillomavirus genotypes in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1: A prospective cohort study.宫颈上皮内瘤变1级女性中人乳头瘤病毒基因型的型特异性持续感染或消退:一项前瞻性队列研究
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015 Jan;58(1):40-5. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.1.40. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Cervista HPV HR assay for detection of human papillomavirus in samples with hybrid capture borderline negative results.使用 Cervista HPV HR 检测试剂盒检测杂交捕获法临界值阴性样本中的人乳头瘤病毒。
APMIS. 2010 Sep 1;118(9):681-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02639.x.
2
Clinical performance of the PreTect HPV-Proofer E6/E7 mRNA assay in comparison with that of the Hybrid Capture 2 test for identification of women at risk of cervical cancer.PreTect HPV-Proofer E6/E7 mRNA 检测与 Hybrid Capture 2 检测在识别宫颈癌高危女性中的临床性能比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Aug;48(8):2779-85. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00382-10. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
3
Comparison of the Cobas 4800 HPV test and the Seeplex HPV4A ACE with the hybrid capture 2 test.
Cobas 4800 HPV 检测与 Seeplex HPV4A ACE 检测与杂交捕获 2 检测的比较。
Int J Med Sci. 2013;10(2):119-23. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5460. Epub 2012 Dec 30.
Clinical validation of the Cervista HPV HR and 16/18 genotyping tests for use in women with ASC-US cytology.
Cervista HPV HR 和 16/18 基因分型检测用于 ASC-US 细胞学女性的临床验证。
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;118(2):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.04.013. Epub 2010 May 21.
4
Comparison of the novel human papillomavirus 4 auto-capillary electrophoresis test with the hybrid capture 2 assay and with the PCR HPV typing set test in the detection of high-risk HPV including HPV 16 and 18 genotypes in cervical specimens.新型人乳头瘤病毒4型自动毛细管电泳检测法与杂交捕获2检测法及聚合酶链反应人乳头瘤病毒分型检测法在宫颈标本中检测包括16型和18型基因型在内的高危人乳头瘤病毒的比较。
J Korean Med Sci. 2009 Aug;24(4):579-84. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.579. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
5
Analytical performance of the Investigational Use Only Cervista HPV HR test as determined by a multi-center study.仅用于研究用途的 Cervista HPV HR 检测的分析性能:一项多中心研究的结果
J Clin Virol. 2009 Jul;45 Suppl 1:S63-72. doi: 10.1016/S1386-6532(09)70010-1.
6
Study comparing human papillomavirus (HPV) real-time multiplex PCR and Hybrid Capture II INNO-LiPA v2 HPV genotyping PCR assays.比较人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)实时多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)与杂交捕获II INNO-LiPA v2 HPV基因分型PCR检测方法的研究。
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jul;47(7):2106-13. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01907-08. Epub 2009 May 6.
7
Epidemiology and natural history of human papillomavirus infections and type-specific implications in cervical neoplasia.人乳头瘤病毒感染的流行病学、自然史及其在宫颈肿瘤形成中的型别特异性影响
Vaccine. 2008 Aug 19;26 Suppl 10:K1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.05.064.
8
Comparison of the Third Wave Invader human papillomavirus (HPV) assay and the digene HPV hybrid capture 2 assay for detection of high-risk HPV DNA.用于检测高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA的第三代侵入者HPV检测法与Digene HPV杂交捕获2检测法的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 May;46(5):1641-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01824-07. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
9
Comparison of a novel HPV test with the Hybrid Capture II (hcII) and a reference PCR method shows high specificity and positive predictive value for 13 high-risk human papillomavirus infections.一种新型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测方法与杂交捕获二代(hcII)及参考聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法的比较显示,其对13种高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染具有高特异性和阳性预测值。
J Clin Virol. 2008 May;42(1):22-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
10
Comparison of AMPLICOR and Hybrid Capture II assays for high risk HPV detection in normal and abnormal liquid-based cytology: use of INNO-LiPA Genotyping assay to screen the discordant results.在正常和异常液基细胞学中使用AMPLICOR和杂交捕获II检测法进行高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测的比较:采用INNO-LiPA基因分型检测法筛查不一致结果
J Clin Virol. 2008 Feb;41(2):104-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.09.012. Epub 2007 Nov 26.