• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用拉施测量法分析字母名称知识。

Analysis of letter name knowledge using Rasch measurement.

作者信息

Bowles Ryan P, Skibbe Lori E, Justice Laura M

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Meas. 2011;12(4):387-98.

PMID:22357159
Abstract

Letter name knowledge (LNK) is a key predictor of later reading ability and has been emphasized strongly in recent educational policy. Studies of LNK have implicitly treated it as a unidimensional construct with all letters equally relevant to its measurement. However, some empirical research suggests that contextual factors can affect the measurement of LNK. In this study, we analyze responses from 909 children on measures of LNK using the Rasch model and its extensions, and consider two contextual factors: the format of assessment and the own-name advantage, which states that children are more likely to know letters in their own first names. Results indicate that both contextual factors have important impacts on measurement and that LNK does not meet the requirements of Rasch measurement even when accounting for the contextual factors. These findings introduce philosophical concerns for measurement of constrained skills which have limited content for assessment.

摘要

字母名称知识(LNK)是后期阅读能力的关键预测指标,并且在近期的教育政策中得到了强烈强调。对LNK的研究一直将其隐含地视为一个单维结构,所有字母对其测量的相关性相同。然而,一些实证研究表明,情境因素会影响LNK的测量。在本研究中,我们使用拉施模型及其扩展方法分析了909名儿童在LNK测量指标上的回答,并考虑了两个情境因素:评估形式和名字优势,即儿童更有可能认识自己名字中的字母。结果表明,这两个情境因素对测量都有重要影响,并且即使考虑了情境因素,LNK也不符合拉施测量的要求。这些发现引发了对受限技能测量的哲学思考,这些技能的评估内容有限。

相似文献

1
Analysis of letter name knowledge using Rasch measurement.使用拉施测量法分析字母名称知识。
J Appl Meas. 2011;12(4):387-98.
2
Implementation of Response to Intervention (RtI) Model in Spain: an example of a collaboration between Canarian universities and the department of education of the Canary Islands.西班牙实施反应干预(RtI)模式:加那利群岛大学与加那利群岛教育部门合作的范例。
Psicothema. 2010 Nov;22(4):935-42.
3
Dyslexics are impaired on implicit higher-order sequence learning, but not on implicit spatial context learning.阅读障碍者在隐性高阶序列学习方面存在缺陷,但在隐性空间背景学习方面则不然。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1131-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.015. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
4
[What are the differences between average readings with writing difficulties and children with reading and writing difficulties? Follow-up, kind of writing errors and learning prerequisites].有书写困难的学生与有读写困难的学生在平均阅读水平上有哪些差异?随访、书写错误类型及学习前提条件
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr. 1994 Jun;22(2):87-96.
5
Precursors of literacy delay among children at genetic risk of dyslexia.有诵读困难遗传风险的儿童中识字延迟的先兆。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;41(2):203-13.
6
Letter names and phonological awareness help children to learn letter-sound relations.字母名称和语音意识有助于儿童学习字母-声音关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 May;109(1):25-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.12.006.
7
Response to instruction, English language learners and disproportionate representation: the role of assessment.对指令的反应、英语学习者和不成比例的代表性:评估的作用。
Psicothema. 2010 Nov;22(4):970-4.
8
Cognitive correlates of mathematical achievement in children with cerebral palsy and typically developing children.脑性瘫痪儿童与正常发育儿童数学成就的认知相关性。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Mar;82(Pt 1):120-35. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02034.x. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
9
Working memory: its role in dyslexia and other specific learning difficulties.工作记忆:其在诵读困难及其他特定学习困难中的作用。
Dyslexia. 2004 Aug;10(3):196-214. doi: 10.1002/dys.278.
10
Alphabetic skills in preschool: a preliminary study of letter naming and letter writing.
Dev Neuropsychol. 2006;29(1):5-19. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2901_2.

引用本文的文献

1
Past perspectives and new opportunities for the explanatory item response model.解释性项目反应模型的过去视角与新机遇。
Ann Dyslexia. 2020 Jul;70(2):160-179. doi: 10.1007/s11881-020-00204-y. Epub 2020 Jul 29.