University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Hypertens Res. 2012 Jul;35(7):725-8. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.18. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
Patients with malignant hypertension (MHT) have persistent vascular dysfunction and a much worse clinical prognosis than non-MHT hypertensive patients, despite good long-term blood pressure (BP) control. We hypothesized that abnormal arterial (arterial elastance (Ea); arterial elastance index (EaI)) and ventricular (End-systolic elastance (Ees) and End-diastolic elastance (Eed)) elastances are present in treated MHT patients, compared with non-MHT hypertensive controls. Echocardiographic parameters of cardiac and vascular stiffness (EaI, Ees and Eed) were quantified in patients with stable MHT and treated 'high-risk' hypertension patients (HHT, but non-MHT). All patients had well-controlled BP, with a median follow-up time for MHT of 144 months. Ea was calculated from stroke volume and systolic BP and adjusted by body area (EaI). Ees was calculated using systolic and diastolic BP, stroke volume, ejection fraction, time intervals and estimated normalized ventricular elastance at arterial end diastole. Eed was calculated from Doppler parameters and the diastolic filling volume. Both study groups had preserved left ventricular contractility, with no significant differences on 3D-echocardiography (P=0.10) There were no significant differences in EaI (P=0.83), Ees (P=0.32), Eed (P=0.23) and arterial-ventricular interaction (Ees/Ea, P=0.69). In the MHT group, Eed positively correlated with age (r=0.56, P=0.38) and systolic BP (r=0.68, P=0.008). On multivariable regression analysis, MHT status was not predictive of the ventricular and Ea. Despite documented vascular dysfunction in patients with previously diagnosed stable MHT, the arterial and systolic elastances were similar to HHT patients, suggesting that adequate BP control in MHT patients allows preservation or restoration of normal arterial-ventricular coupling.
患有恶性高血压(MHT)的患者尽管长期血压(BP)控制良好,但仍存在持续性血管功能障碍和比非 MHT 高血压患者更差的临床预后。我们假设与非 MHT 高血压对照相比,治疗后的 MHT 患者存在异常的动脉(动脉弹性(Ea);动脉弹性指数(EaI))和心室(收缩末期弹性(Ees)和舒张末期弹性(Eed))弹性。在稳定的 MHT 患者和治疗的“高危”高血压患者(HHT,但非 MHT)中,定量了心脏和血管僵硬的超声心动图参数(EaI、Ees 和 Eed)。所有患者的血压均得到良好控制,MHT 的中位随访时间为 144 个月。Ea 是从心排量和收缩压计算得出的,并通过体表面积进行调整(EaI)。Ees 是使用收缩压和舒张压、心排量、射血分数、时间间隔和估计的动脉舒张末期归一化心室弹性计算得出的。Eed 是从多普勒参数和舒张充盈量计算得出的。两组研究对象的左心室收缩功能均保持正常,3D 超声心动图检查无明显差异(P=0.10)。EaI(P=0.83)、Ees(P=0.32)、Eed(P=0.23)和动静脉相互作用(Ees/Ea,P=0.69)均无显著差异。在 MHT 组中,Eed 与年龄呈正相关(r=0.56,P=0.38)和收缩压(r=0.68,P=0.008)。多元回归分析显示,MHT 状态不是心室和 Ea 的预测因素。尽管在先前诊断为稳定的 MHT 患者中存在已确诊的血管功能障碍,但动脉和收缩期弹性与 HHT 患者相似,这表明 MHT 患者的血压控制良好可维持或恢复正常的动静脉偶联。