Department of Mechanics, LadHyX, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France.
J Exp Biol. 2012 Mar 15;215(Pt 6):914-21. doi: 10.1242/jeb.058933.
The modeling of fluid-structure interactions, such as flow-induced vibrations, is a well-developed field of mechanical engineering. Many methods exist, and it seems natural to apply them to model the behavior of plants, and potentially other cantilever-like biological structures, under flow. Overcoming this disciplinary divide, and the application of such models to biological systems, will significantly advance our understanding of ecological patterns and processes and improve our predictive capabilities. Nonetheless, several methodological issues must first be addressed, which I describe here using two practical examples that have strong similarities: one from agricultural sciences and the other from nuclear engineering. Very similar issues arise in both: individual and collective behavior, small and large space and time scales, porous modeling, standard and extreme events, trade-off between the surface of exchange and individual or collective risk of damage, variability, hostile environments and, in some aspects, evolution. The conclusion is that, although similar issues do exist, which need to be exploited in some detail, there is a significant gap that requires new developments. It is obvious that living plants grow in and adapt to their environment, which certainly makes plant biomechanics fundamentally distinct from classical mechanical engineering. Moreover, the selection processes in biology and in human engineering are truly different, making the issue of safety different as well. A thorough understanding of these similarities and differences is needed to work efficiently in the application of a mechanistic approach to ecology.
流固耦合的建模,如流致振动,是机械工程中一个非常成熟的领域。有许多方法存在,将它们应用于模拟植物在流动下的行为,以及潜在的其他类似悬臂的生物结构,似乎是很自然的。克服这种学科上的鸿沟,并将这些模型应用于生物系统,将极大地促进我们对生态模式和过程的理解,并提高我们的预测能力。尽管如此,首先必须解决几个方法学问题,我在这里使用两个具有很强相似性的实际例子来描述这些问题:一个来自农业科学,另一个来自核工程。在这两个例子中都会出现非常相似的问题:个体和集体行为、小和大的空间和时间尺度、多孔建模、标准和极端事件、交换表面和个体或集体损伤风险之间的权衡、可变性、恶劣环境,以及在某些方面的进化。结论是,尽管存在相似的问题,需要进行一些详细的探讨,但仍存在着巨大的差距,需要新的发展。显然,活体植物是在其环境中生长和适应的,这使得植物生物力学与经典机械工程有根本的区别。此外,生物学和人类工程学中的选择过程是真正不同的,这使得安全性问题也不同。为了有效地将机械方法应用于生态学,需要深入了解这些相似性和差异。