Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Biol Lett. 2012 Aug 23;8(4):530-2. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0032. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
Ambient noise can mask acoustic cues, making their detection and discrimination difficult for receivers. This can result in two types of error: missed detections, when receivers fail to respond to the appropriate cues, and false alarms, when they respond to inappropriate cues. Nestling birds are error-prone, sometimes failing to beg when parents arrive with food (committing missed detections) or begging in response to stimuli other than a parent's arrival (committing false alarms). Here, we ask whether the frequency of these errors by nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) increases in the presence of noise. We found that nestlings exposed to noise had more missed detections than their unexposed counterparts. We also found that false alarms remained low overall and did not differ significantly between noise and quiet treatments. Our results suggest that nestlings living in noisy environments may be less responsive to their parents than nestlings in quieter environments.
环境噪声会掩盖声音线索,使接收者难以检测和辨别。这可能导致两种类型的错误:漏检,即接收者未能对适当的线索做出反应;和虚警,即它们对不适当的线索做出反应。巢鸟容易出错,有时当父母带着食物到达时,它们会不叫(犯漏检错误),或者对父母到达以外的刺激做出反应(犯虚警错误)。在这里,我们询问巢中树燕(Tachycineta bicolor)的这些错误频率是否会随着噪声的增加而增加。我们发现,暴露在噪声中的雏鸟比未暴露在噪声中的雏鸟漏检的次数更多。我们还发现,总的来说,虚警率仍然很低,在噪声和安静处理之间没有显著差异。我们的结果表明,生活在嘈杂环境中的巢鸟可能对父母的反应不如生活在安静环境中的巢鸟强烈。