• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价和 meta 分析:新辅助放化疗治疗直肠癌后病理完全缓解的结局。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Outcomes, Research and Education and Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2012 Jul;99(7):918-28. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8702. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.8702
PMID:22362002
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and interval proctectomy, 15-20 per cent of patients are found to have a pathological complete response (pCR) to combined multimodal therapy, but controversy persists about whether this yields a survival benefit. This systematic review evaluated current evidence regarding long-term oncological outcomes in patients found to have a pCR to neoadjuvant CRT.

METHODS

Three major databases (PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library) were searched. The systematic review included all original articles reporting long-term outcomes in patients with rectal cancer who had a pCR to neoadjuvant CRT, published in English, from January 1950 to March 2011.

RESULTS

A total of 724 studies were identified for screening. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 studies involving 3363 patients (1263 with pCR and 2100 without) were included (mean age 60 years, 65·0 per cent men). Some 73·4 per cent had a sphincter-saving procedure. Mean follow-up was 55·5 (range 40-87) months. For patients with a pCR, the weighted mean local recurrence rate was 0·7 (range 0-2·6) per cent. Distant failure was observed in 8·7 per cent. Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 90·2 and 87·0 per cent respectively. Compared with non-responders, a pCR was associated with fewer local recurrences (odds ratio (OR) 0·25; P = 0·002) and less frequent distant failure (OR 0·23; P < 0·001), with a greater likelihood of being alive (OR 3·28; P = 0·001) and disease-free (OR 4·33, P < 0·001) at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

A pCR following neoadjuvant CRT is associated with excellent long-term survival, with low rates of local recurrence and distant failure.

摘要

背景

新辅助放化疗(CRT)和间隔直肠切除术后,15-20%的患者对联合多模式治疗有病理完全缓解(pCR),但关于这是否带来生存获益仍存在争议。本系统评价评估了新辅助 CRT 后 pCR 患者的长期肿瘤学结局的现有证据。

方法

检索了三个主要数据库(PubMed、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆)。系统评价纳入了所有报道新辅助 CRT 后 pCR 患者长期结局的原始文章,发表语言为英文,时间跨度为 1950 年 1 月至 2011 年 3 月。

结果

共筛选出 724 篇研究,经过纳入和排除标准,纳入 16 项研究共 3363 例患者(pCR 组 1263 例,无 pCR 组 2100 例)(平均年龄 60 岁,男性占 65.0%)。约 73.4%的患者接受了保肛手术。平均随访时间为 55.5(40-87)个月。pCR 患者的局部复发率加权平均值为 0.7%(0-2.6%)。远处转移率为 8.7%。5 年总生存率和无病生存率分别为 90.2%和 87.0%。与无应答者相比,pCR 与较少的局部复发(比值比(OR)0.25;P = 0.002)和远处转移(OR 0.23;P < 0.001)相关,并且在 5 年时更有可能存活(OR 3.28;P = 0.001)和无病(OR 4.33,P < 0.001)。

结论

新辅助 CRT 后 pCR 与良好的长期生存相关,局部复发和远处转移率低。

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.系统评价和 meta 分析:新辅助放化疗治疗直肠癌后病理完全缓解的结局。
Br J Surg. 2012 Jul;99(7):918-28. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8702. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Evaluating the Impact of Induction and Consolidation Total Neoadjuvant Therapies Compared to Conventional Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.评估诱导和巩固性全新辅助治疗与传统放化疗相比对局部晚期直肠癌的影响:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Jun 1;68(6):687-701. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003687. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
4
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant treatment strategies for stage II and III rectal cancer.一项比较II期和III期直肠癌新辅助治疗策略的随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2023 Mar;183:103927. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103927. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
5
Response prediction for neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer patients-improvement in decision-making: A systematic review.局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助治疗的反应预测——决策制定的改进:一项系统评价
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov 15:109463. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109463.
6
Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.根治性子宫切除术联合放化疗与单纯根治性子宫切除术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的疗效比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub3.
7
Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.老年新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的治疗:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 23;3(3):CD013261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013261.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Mucinous Rectal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated with a Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.黏液性直肠腺癌对新辅助放化疗反应不佳:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Dec;59(12):1200-1208. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000635.
10
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer operated for cure.针对接受根治性手术的直肠癌患者的术后辅助化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004078.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: a promising strategy for MSS/pMMR locally advanced rectal cancer.新辅助放化疗联合免疫治疗:MSS/pMMR局部晚期直肠癌的一种有前景的策略。
Med Oncol. 2025 Aug 13;42(10):428. doi: 10.1007/s12032-025-02918-8.
2
Non-Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Response of Rectal Cancer Chemoradiation with and without Low-Dose Aspirin.比较直肠癌放化疗联合与不联合低剂量阿司匹林反应的非随机对照试验
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2025 Mar 20;39:44. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.39.44. eCollection 2025.
3
Radiotherapy boost to the primary tumour in locally advanced rectal cancer: Systematic review of practices and -analysis.
局部晚期直肠癌原发肿瘤的放疗增敏:实践系统评价与分析
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jul 13;54:101014. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101014. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Delayed surgery for more than 9 weeks induces worse survival outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer patients with poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a propensity score matched cohort study.对于新辅助放化疗反应不佳的局部晚期直肠癌患者,延迟手术超过9周会导致更差的生存结果:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2025 Jul 2;13:goaf060. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goaf060. eCollection 2025.
5
Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer in a real-world setting: a population-based study.真实世界中局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗后的病理完全缓解:一项基于人群的研究
Front Oncol. 2025 May 30;15:1573819. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1573819. eCollection 2025.
6
Tumor regression pattern may impact the prognosis of rectal cancer patients with tumor regression grade 1 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.肿瘤退缩模式可能会影响新辅助放化疗后肿瘤退缩分级为1级的直肠癌患者的预后。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2024 May 30;12:goae050. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goae050. eCollection 2024.
7
The Role of Pre-Treatment Inflammatory Biomarkers in Predicting Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer.治疗前炎症生物标志物在预测直肠癌新辅助放化疗肿瘤反应中的作用
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 8;61(5):865. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050865.
8
Prediction of the Therapeutic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Rectal Cancer Using a Deep Learning Model.使用深度学习模型预测直肠癌新辅助化疗的治疗反应
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2025 Apr 25;9(2):202-212. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2024-085. eCollection 2025.
9
MRI-based radiomics for predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于MRI的影像组学预测局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗后病理完全缓解:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 10;15:1550838. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1550838. eCollection 2025.
10
Evaluation of the effectiveness of using capecitabine versus capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin during preoperative radiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.直肠癌患者术前放疗期间使用卡培他滨与卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂的疗效评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 21;104(8):e41580. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041580.