Suppr超能文献

局部麻醉与区域麻醉在白内障手术中的应用:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia for cataract surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):659-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.056. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine possible differences in the clinical outcomes of topical anesthesia (TA) and regional anesthesia including retrobulbar anesthesia (RBA) and peribulbar anesthesia (PBA) in phacoemulsification.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients from previously published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of phacoemulsification under TA and RBA/PBA reporting clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration method to identify RCTs that compare TA and RBA/PBA in phacoemulsification.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome parameters investigated were pain score during and after surgery, intraoperative difficulties and inadvertent ocular movement, intraoperative necessity to administer additional anesthesia, and patient preference. Secondary outcome parameters investigated were postoperative visual acuity, anesthesia-related complications, intraoperative complications, and severe local or systemic complications.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were identified and analyzed to compare TA (1084 eyes) with RBA/PBA (1121 eyes) in phacoemulsification. Data synthesis showed that intraoperative and postoperative pain perception was significantly higher in the TA group (P < 0.05). The TA group showed more frequent inadvertent ocular movement (P < 0.05) and a greater intraoperative need for supplementary anesthesia (P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in intraoperative difficulties as assessed by the surgeons (P > 0.05). Patients significantly preferred TA (P < 0.00001). The RBA/PBA group had more frequent anesthesia-related complications, such as chemosis, periorbital hematoma, and subconjunctival hemorrhage (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in surgery-related complications (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with RBA/PBA, TA does not provide the same excellent pain relief in cataract surgery; however, it achieves similar surgical outcomes. Topical anesthesia reduces injection-related complications and alleviates patients' fear of injection. The choice of TA is not suitable for patients with a higher initial blood pressure or greater pain perception.

摘要

目的

探讨白内障超声乳化术中局部麻醉(TA)与球后麻醉(RBA)和球周麻醉(PBA)的临床结局差异。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

参与者

来自先前发表的比较 TA 和 RBA/PBA 在白内障超声乳化术中临床结局的随机对照试验(RCT)的患者。

方法

根据 Cochrane 协作方法进行全面的文献检索,以确定比较 TA 和 RBA/PBA 在白内障超声乳化术中的 RCT。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标为手术期间和手术后的疼痛评分、术中困难和意外眼球运动、术中需要额外麻醉的情况以及患者的偏好。次要观察指标为术后视力、麻醉相关并发症、术中并发症和严重局部或全身并发症。

结果

共确定并分析了 15 项研究,比较 TA(1084 只眼)与 RBA/PBA(1121 只眼)在白内障超声乳化术中的情况。数据综合显示,TA 组术中及术后疼痛感知明显更高(P < 0.05)。TA 组术中更频繁出现意外眼球运动(P < 0.05),术中需要补充麻醉的情况更常见(P = 0.03)。两组间术者评估的术中困难无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。患者明显更喜欢 TA(P < 0.00001)。RBA/PBA 组麻醉相关并发症如眼睑肿胀、眶周血肿和球结膜下出血更常见(P < 0.05)。手术相关并发症无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

与 RBA/PBA 相比,TA 并不能在白内障手术中提供相同的卓越止痛效果,但能获得相似的手术结果。局部麻醉可减少注射相关并发症,并减轻患者对注射的恐惧。对于初始血压较高或疼痛感知较强的患者,选择 TA 并不合适。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验