Department of Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine Hospital, Safat, Kuwait.
Med Sci Monit. 2012 Mar;18(3):CR160-73. doi: 10.12659/msm.882521.
There is controversy about differential meaningfulness between comorbid generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)/ major depressive disorder (MDD), the corresponding "pure" disorders and subthreshold conditions. We compared subjects who met DSM-IVTR criteria of symptoms and functional impairment for comorbid GAD/MDD, versus those with GAD, MDD, subthreshold conditions, and without significant symptoms. The comparison measures were socio-demographics, clinical severity, and quality of life (QOL).
MATERIAL/METHOD: Participants (N=3155: 55.1% female, aged 16-87 yrs) were a general population sample of Kuwaitis who self-completed DSM-IVTR criteria-based questionnaires and the WHOQOL-BREF in 2006/7. We scrutinized the questionnaires and classified them into categories.
Of the 273 GAD and 210 MDD cases, the prevalence of comorbidity among cases with GAD was 30.8%, and 40% among MDD. Of the 398 subthreshold GAD and 194 subthreshold MDD cases, 58 had subthreshold anxiety/depression comorbidity. Comorbid threshold GAD/MDD cases were significantly older, and more likely to be women, divorced and unemployed, compared with GAD and MDD. In all measures, the threshold GAD/MDD comorbidity was the severest condition. There was a monotonic decrease in QOL with increasing anxiety-depression symptoms. For the predictors of subjective QOL, the GAD/MDD comorbidity group differed markedly from the others.
The high prevalence of comorbidity and subthreshold conditions supports the recommendation to assess them routinely, regardless of the primary reason for consultation. Our findings support a dimensional model with comorbid GAD/MDD at the higher end of a continuum, and differing from the "pure" conditions by a later onset and predictors of subjective wellbeing.
广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)/重度抑郁障碍(MDD)合并症、相应的“单纯”障碍和亚阈值状态之间的差异意义存在争议。我们比较了符合 DSM-IVTR 症状和功能障碍标准的 GAD/MDD 合并症患者与 GAD、MDD、亚阈值状态且无明显症状的患者。比较的指标包括社会人口统计学、临床严重程度和生活质量(QOL)。
材料/方法:参与者(N=3155:55.1%女性,年龄 16-87 岁)是 2006/7 年科威特人一般人群样本,他们自行完成基于 DSM-IVTR 标准的问卷和 WHOQOL-BREF。我们仔细检查了问卷并对其进行了分类。
在 273 例 GAD 和 210 例 MDD 病例中,GAD 病例的合并症患病率为 30.8%,MDD 为 40%。在 398 例亚阈值 GAD 和 194 例亚阈值 MDD 病例中,58 例有亚阈值焦虑/抑郁合并症。与 GAD 和 MDD 相比,阈度过高的 GAD/MDD 合并症患者年龄较大,更可能是女性、离婚和失业。在所有测量中,阈度过高的 GAD/MDD 合并症是最严重的情况。焦虑-抑郁症状越严重,生活质量越低。对于主观 QOL 的预测因素,GAD/MDD 合并症组与其他组有明显差异。
合并症和亚阈值状态的高患病率支持常规评估这些状态的建议,无论主要咨询原因是什么。我们的研究结果支持一个维度模型,其中 GAD/MDD 合并症处于连续体的较高端,与“单纯”障碍不同,发病较晚,主观幸福感的预测因素也不同。