Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Asian J Androl. 2012 May;14(3):349-54. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.140. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
Greater understanding of the biology and epidemiology of prostate cancer in the last several decades have led to significant advances in its management. Prostate cancer is now detected in greater numbers at lower stages of disease and is amenable to multiple forms of efficacious treatment. However, there is a lack of conclusive data demonstrating a definitive mortality benefit from this earlier diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. It is likely due to the treatment of a large proportion of indolent cancers that would have had little adverse impact on health or lifespan if left alone. Due to this overtreatment phenomenon, active surveillance with delayed intervention is gaining traction as a viable management approach in contemporary practice. The ability to distinguish clinically insignificant cancers from those with a high risk of progression and/or lethality is critical to the appropriate selection of patients for surveillance protocols versus immediate intervention. This chapter will review the ability of various prediction models, including risk groupings and nomograms, to predict indolent disease and determine their role in the contemporary management of clinically localized prostate cancer.
在过去几十年中,对前列腺癌的生物学和流行病学有了更深入的了解,这使得其治疗方法取得了重大进展。现在,前列腺癌在疾病的早期阶段被更多地发现,并且可以采用多种有效的治疗方法。然而,目前还缺乏确凿的数据表明早期诊断和治疗前列腺癌能够明确降低死亡率。这可能是由于治疗了很大一部分惰性癌症,如果不加以治疗,这些癌症对健康或寿命的不良影响很小。由于这种过度治疗的现象,延迟干预的主动监测作为一种可行的管理方法,在当代实践中越来越受到关注。区分临床意义不大的癌症和具有高进展和/或致命风险的癌症的能力,对于选择适合监测方案的患者与立即干预的患者至关重要。本章将回顾各种预测模型(包括风险分组和列线图)预测惰性疾病的能力,并确定它们在当代局限性前列腺癌临床管理中的作用。