Yale School of Management, Box 208200, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Department of Urology, Yale Medical School, New Haven, CT, USA.
Health Care Manag Sci. 2020 Mar;23(1):102-116. doi: 10.1007/s10729-019-09480-6. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of death from cancer, behind lung cancer, for men in the U. S, with nearly 30,000 deaths per year. A key problem is the difficulty in distinguishing, after biopsy, between significant cancers that should be treated immediately and clinically insignificant tumors that should be monitored by active surveillance. Prostate cancer has been over-treated; a recent European randomized screening trial shows overtreatment rates of 40%. Overtreatment of insignificant tumors reduces quality of life, while delayed treatment of significant cancers increases the incidence of metastatic disease and death. We develop a decision analysis approach based on simulation and probability modeling. For a given prostate volume and number of biopsy needles, our rule is to treat if total length of cancer in needle cores exceeds c, the cutoff value, with active surveillance otherwise, provided pathology is favorable. We determine the optimal cutoff value, c*. There are two misclassification costs: treating a minimal tumor and not treating a small or medium tumor (large tumors were never misclassified in our simulations). Bayes' Theorem is used to predict the probabilities of minimal, small, medium, and large cancers given the total length of cancer found in biopsy cores. A 20 needle biopsy in conjunction with our new decision analysis approach significantly reduces the expected loss associated with a patient in our target population about to undergo a biopsy. Longer needles reduce expected loss. Increasing the number of biopsy cores from the current norm of 10-12 to about 20, in conjunction with our new decision model, should substantially improve the ability to distinguish minimal from significant prostate cancer by minimizing the expected loss from over-treating minimal tumors and delaying treatment of significant cancers.
前列腺癌是美国男性癌症死亡的第二大原因,仅次于肺癌,每年有近 3 万人因此死亡。一个关键问题是,在活检后,区分应立即治疗的显著癌症和应通过主动监测进行监测的临床意义不大的肿瘤存在困难。前列腺癌治疗过度;最近的一项欧洲随机筛查试验显示过度治疗率为 40%。对无意义肿瘤的过度治疗会降低生活质量,而对有意义癌症的延迟治疗会增加转移性疾病和死亡的发生率。我们开发了一种基于模拟和概率建模的决策分析方法。对于给定的前列腺体积和活检针数量,如果针芯中癌症的总长度超过 c(截断值),我们的规则是进行积极监测,否则进行积极监测,前提是病理学是有利的。我们确定最佳截断值 c*。有两种误诊成本:治疗微小肿瘤和不治疗小或中等肿瘤(在我们的模拟中,从未误诊过大肿瘤)。贝叶斯定理用于预测在活检芯中发现的癌症总长度给定的情况下,微小癌、小癌、中癌和大癌的概率。20 针活检与我们的新决策分析方法相结合,可以显著降低即将接受活检的目标人群中患者的预期损失。更长的针减少预期损失。与我们的新决策模型相结合,将当前的 10-12 针活检核心数量增加到约 20 个,应该能够通过最小化过度治疗微小肿瘤的预期损失和延迟治疗有意义的癌症,极大地提高区分微小和显著前列腺癌的能力。