Suppr超能文献

手术中的观察性团队评估:短期培训后临床和非临床评估者校准的可行性。

Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: feasibility of clinical and nonclinical assessor calibration with short-term training.

机构信息

Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):804-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824a9a02.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of training clinical and nonclinical novice assessors to rate teamwork behavior in the operating room with short-term structured training using the observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS) tool.

BACKGROUND

Effective teamwork is fundamental to the delivery of optimal patient care in the operating room (OR). OTAS provides a comprehensive and robust measure of teamwork in surgery. To date, assessors with a background in psychology/human factors have been shown to be able to use OTAS reliably after training. However, the feasibility of observer training over a short timescale and accessibility to the wider clinical community (ie, OTAS use by clinicians) are yet to be empirically demonstrated.

METHODS

Ten general surgery cases were observed and assessed using OTAS in real-time by an expert in rating OTAS behaviors (100+ cases rated) and 4 novices: 2 psychologists and 2 surgeons. Assessors were blinded to each other's scores during observations. After each observation, scores were compared and discussed between expert and novice assessors in a debriefing session.

RESULTS

All novices were reliable with the expert to a acceptable degree at rating all OTAS behaviors by the end of training (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.68). For 3 of the 5 behaviors (communication, cooperation, and leadership), calibration improved most rapidly across the first 7 observed cases. For monitoring/situational awareness, calibration improved steadily across the 10 observed cases. For coordination, no significant improvement in calibration over time was observed because of high interrater reliability from the outset (ie, a ceiling effect). There was no significant difference between surgeons and psychologists in their calibration with the expert.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to train both clinicians and nonclinicians to use OTAS to assess teamwork behaviors in ORs over a short structured training period. OTAS is an accessible tool that can be used robustly (ie, reliably) by assessors from both clinical and nonclinical backgrounds.

摘要

目的

评估使用短期结构化培训,通过手术观察性团队评估工具(OTAS)培训临床和非临床新手评估员对手术室团队行为进行评分的可行性。

背景

有效的团队合作是手术室(OR)提供最佳患者护理的基础。OTAS 提供了手术中团队合作的全面而强大的衡量标准。迄今为止,具有心理学/人为因素背景的评估员在接受培训后已被证明能够可靠地使用 OTAS。然而,在短时间内进行观察者培训的可行性以及更广泛的临床社区(即,临床医生使用 OTAS)的可及性尚未得到经验证明。

方法

由一位熟悉 OTAS 评分行为的专家(评分 100+案例)和 4 位新手(2 位心理学家和 2 位外科医生)实时观察和评估 10 例普通外科手术案例。在观察过程中,评估员彼此之间的分数是盲目的。每次观察后,在汇报会上,专家和新手评估员比较并讨论分数。

结果

在培训结束时,所有新手在评估所有 OTAS 行为方面都与专家具有可接受的可靠程度(组内相关系数≥0.68)。对于 5 个行为中的 3 个(沟通、合作和领导),在观察的前 7 例中,校准速度最快。对于监测/态势感知,校准在 10 例观察病例中稳步提高。对于协调,由于一开始就具有较高的评分者间可靠性(即,天花板效应),因此校准没有随着时间的推移而显著提高。外科医生和心理学家在与专家的校准方面没有显著差异。

结论

在短期结构化培训期间,培训临床医生和非临床医生使用 OTAS 评估手术室团队行为是可行的。OTAS 是一种易于使用的工具,具有临床和非临床背景的评估员都可以可靠地(即可靠地)使用它。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验