Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77080, USA.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2012 Mar;49(1):81-90. doi: 10.1037/a0026148.
This practice review focuses on the challenges of conducting sensitive and accurate assessments of the relative risk for suicide attempts and completed suicides. Suicide and suicide attempts are a frequently encountered clinical crisis, and the assessment, management, and treatment of suicidal patients is one of the most stressful tasks for clinicians. An array of risk factors, warning signs, and protective factors associated with suicide risk are reviewed; however, we are not yet in possession of evidence-based diagnostic tests that can accurately predict suicide risk on an individual level without also creating an inordinate number of false-positive predictions. Given the current limitations of assessment strategies, clinicians are advised to keep in mind that patients contemplating suicide are under enormous psychological distress, requiring sensitive and thoughtful engagement during the assessment process. An overarching goal of these assessments should be conducted within the therapeutic frame, in which efforts are made to enhance the therapeutic alliance by negotiating a collaborative approach to assessing risk and understanding why thoughts of suicide are so compelling. Within this treatment heuristic, the Suicide Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage (SAFE-T) is recommended as a pragmatic multidimensional assessment protocol incorporating the best known risk and protective factors.
本实践综述重点关注对自杀未遂和自杀死亡的相对风险进行敏感和准确评估所面临的挑战。自杀和自杀未遂是临床中经常遇到的危机,对自杀患者进行评估、管理和治疗是临床医生最具压力的任务之一。本文回顾了与自杀风险相关的一系列风险因素、预警信号和保护因素;然而,我们尚未拥有基于证据的诊断测试,可以在不产生过多假阳性预测的情况下准确预测个体的自杀风险。鉴于目前评估策略的局限性,建议临床医生牢记,考虑自杀的患者承受着巨大的心理痛苦,在评估过程中需要进行敏感和周到的接触。这些评估的总体目标应该在治疗框架内进行,努力通过协商评估风险和了解自杀想法为何如此强烈的协作方法来增强治疗联盟。在这种治疗启发式方法中,建议使用 Suicide Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage(SAFE-T)作为一种实用的多维评估方案,纳入了最知名的风险和保护因素。