• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国每周一次给予艾塞那肽与西格列汀或吡格列酮治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的长期成本-后果分析。

Long-term cost-consequence analysis of exenatide once weekly vs sitagliptin or pioglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes patients in the United States.

机构信息

IMS Health, London, UK.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):654-63. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.670677. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

DOI:10.3111/13696998.2012.670677
PMID:22369345
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Exenatide once-weekly (ExQW) is a GLP-1 receptor agonist shown to lower glucose and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to estimate the clinical benefits and associated economic benefits of treatment with ExQW compared with sitagliptin or pioglitazone in the US.

METHODS

The IMS CORE Diabetes Model, a validated computer simulation model, was used to project lifetime clinical outcomes and complication costs. The costs of glucose-lowering drugs were excluded as not all prices were available. Baseline patient characteristics (mean values: age, 52.5 years; diabetes duration, 6 years; HbA1(c), 8.51%; body mass index, 32.12 kg/m(2)) and clinical data were derived from a phase 3 clinical trial that compared ExQW with sitagliptin or pioglitazone in T2DM patients. At 6 months, patients treated with ExQW had greater improvements in HbA1(c) and body weight than those treated with sitagliptin or pioglitazone. Complication costs were extracted from published sources. Health outcomes and costs were discounted at 3% per year. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Over 35 years, and compared with sitagliptin or pioglitazone, ExQW increased life expectancy by, respectively, 0.28 (13.76 ± 0.17 vs 13.48 ± 0.18) and 0.17 years (13.76 ± 0.17 vs 13.59 ± 0.17), and quality-adjusted life years by, respectively, 0.28 (9.56 ± 0.12 vs 9.28 ± 0.12) and 0.24 years (9.56 ± 0.12 vs 9.32 ± 0.12). ExQW was associated with lower lifetime complication costs: compared with sitagliptin or pioglitazone, ExQW saved, respectively US$2215 (US$55,647 ± 2039 vs US$57,862 ± 2159) and US$933 (US$55,647 ± 2039 vs US$56,580 ± 2007) direct cost per patient. Cost-savings resulted mainly from a lower projected cumulative incidence of cardiovascular diseases and neuropathic complications.

LIMITATIONS

Short-term changes in surrogate end-points were used to project lifetime effects on clinical outcomes. Pharmacy costs were excluded from the analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a patient's lifetime, ExQW was projected to improve health and decrease diabetes-related complication costs compared with sitagliptin or pioglitazone.

摘要

目的

艾塞那肽每周一次(ExQW)是一种 GLP-1 受体激动剂,已被证明可降低 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的血糖和心血管风险因素。本研究的目的是估计与西格列汀或吡格列酮相比,在美国使用 ExQW 治疗的临床获益和相关的经济效益。

方法

使用经过验证的计算机模拟模型 IMS CORE Diabetes Model 来预测终生的临床结果和并发症成本。由于并非所有价格均可用,因此未计入降血糖药物的成本。基线患者特征(平均值:年龄,52.5 岁;糖尿病病程,6 年;HbA1(c),8.51%;体重指数,32.12kg/m2)和临床数据来自一项 3 期临床试验,该试验比较了 ExQW 与 T2DM 患者的西格列汀或吡格列酮。在 6 个月时,接受 ExQW 治疗的患者的 HbA1(c)和体重改善大于接受西格列汀或吡格列酮治疗的患者。并发症成本从已发表的资料中提取。健康结果和成本按每年 3%贴现。进行了敏感性分析。

结果

在 35 年内,与西格列汀或吡格列酮相比,ExQW 分别使预期寿命增加了 0.28 年(13.76 ± 0.17 与 13.48 ± 0.18)和 0.17 年(13.76 ± 0.17 与 13.59 ± 0.17),并使质量调整生命年分别增加了 0.28 年(9.56 ± 0.12 与 9.28 ± 0.12)和 0.24 年(9.56 ± 0.12 与 9.32 ± 0.12)。ExQW 与较低的终生并发症成本相关:与西格列汀或吡格列酮相比,ExQW 分别节省了 2215 美元(55647 美元 ± 2039 美元与 57862 美元 ± 2159 美元)和 933 美元(55647 美元 ± 2039 美元与 56580 美元 ± 2007 美元)每位患者的直接成本。节省成本主要归因于心血管疾病和神经病变并发症的累积发生率预计较低。

局限性

使用短期替代终点的变化来预测对临床结局的终生影响。分析中未计入药房成本。

结论

在患者的一生中,与西格列汀或吡格列酮相比,预计 ExQW 可改善健康状况并降低与糖尿病相关的并发症成本。

相似文献

1
Long-term cost-consequence analysis of exenatide once weekly vs sitagliptin or pioglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes patients in the United States.美国每周一次给予艾塞那肽与西格列汀或吡格列酮治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的长期成本-后果分析。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):654-63. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.670677. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
2
Health and economic outcomes for exenatide once weekly, insulin, and pioglitazone therapies in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a simulation analysis.艾塞那肽每周一次、胰岛素和吡格列酮治疗2型糖尿病的健康和经济结果:一项模拟分析。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:255-64. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S28744. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
3
A cost-effectiveness analysis of pioglitazone plus metformin compared with rosiglitazone plus metformin from a third-party payer perspective in the US.从美国第三方支付者的角度看,吡格列酮加二甲双胍与罗格列酮加二甲双胍的成本效益分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jun;25(6):1343-53. doi: 10.1185/03007990902870084.
4
Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation.新型 2 型糖尿病血糖控制药物:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(36):1-248. doi: 10.3310/hta14360.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of liraglutide versus sitagliptin or exenatide in patients with inadequately controlled Type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs in Greece.利拉鲁肽与西他列汀或艾塞那肽治疗希腊口服降糖药治疗效果不佳的2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 22;14:419. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-419.
6
The cost-effectiveness of exenatide once weekly compared with exenatide twice daily and insulin glargine for the treatment of patients with type two diabetes and body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2) in Spain.在西班牙,每周一次给予艾塞那肽与每日两次给予艾塞那肽和甘精胰岛素比较,用于治疗体重指数(BMI)≥30kg/m(2)的 2 型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2013 Jul;16(7):926-38. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.803110. Epub 2013 May 31.
7
Cost-effectiveness of sitagliptin-based treatment regimens in European patients with type 2 diabetes and haemoglobin A1c above target on metformin monotherapy.基于西他列汀的治疗方案对欧洲2型糖尿病患者且二甲双胍单药治疗时糖化血红蛋白高于目标值的成本效益分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Jun;10 Suppl 1:43-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00886.x.
8
Long-term clinical and economic outcomes associated with liraglutide versus sitagliptin therapy when added to metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a CORE Diabetes Model analysis.利拉鲁肽对比西格列汀联合二甲双胍治疗 2 型糖尿病的长期临床和经济结局:CORE Diabetes Model 分析。
J Med Econ. 2012;15 Suppl 2:28-37. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.716111. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
9
Baseline characteristic differences between patients prescribed sitagliptin vs. other oral antihyperglycemic agents: analysis of a US electronic medical record database.服用西他列汀与其他口服降糖药的患者基线特征差异:一项美国电子病历数据库分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jul;26(7):1697-703. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.489029.
10
Long-term cost-utility analysis of exenatide once weekly versus insulin glargine for the treatment of type 2 diabetes patients in the US.在美国,每周一次艾塞那肽与甘精胰岛素治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的长期成本-效用分析。
J Med Econ. 2012;15 Suppl 2:6-13. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.708691. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse drug events in cost-effectiveness models of pharmacological interventions for diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema: a scoping review.糖尿病、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿药物干预成本效益模型中的药物不良事件:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Nov 1;22(11):2194-2266. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00511.
2
Cost-effectiveness of the add-on exenatide to conventional treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease when considering the coexisting effects of diabetes mellitus.当考虑到糖尿病共存的影响时,在接受常规治疗的帕金森病患者中添加艾塞那肽的成本效益。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0269006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269006. eCollection 2022.
3
Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues.
系统评价经济学研究的荟萃分析:数据协调与方法学问题。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07595-1.
4
Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes who fail metformin monotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies.用于治疗二甲双胍单药治疗失败的2型糖尿病患者的胰高血糖素样肽1激动剂:经济评估研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jul;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001020.
5
How Consistent is the Relationship between Improved Glucose Control and Modelled Health Outcomes for People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus? a Systematic Review.2型糖尿病患者血糖控制改善与模拟健康结局之间的关系有多一致?一项系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Mar;35(3):319-329. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0466-0.
6
Exenatide once-weekly injection for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Chinese patients: current perspectives.艾塞那肽每周一次注射用于治疗中国2型糖尿病患者:当前观点
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Aug 10;11:1153-62. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S81088. eCollection 2015.
7
Exenatide Extended-Release: An Updated Review of Its Use in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.艾塞那肽长效:在 2 型糖尿病中的应用更新评价。
Drugs. 2015 Jul;75(10):1141-52. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0420-z.
8
Exenatide extended-release: a once weekly treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes.艾塞那肽延长释放剂:每周一次治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的药物。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014 Jun 24;7:229-39. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S35331. eCollection 2014.
9
Pathophysiological and pharmacological rationale for the use of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes.艾塞那肽每周一次用于2型糖尿病患者的病理生理及药理学依据。
Adv Ther. 2014 Mar;31(3):247-63. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0101-4. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
10
Exenatide extended-release; clinical trials, patient preference, and economic considerations.艾塞那肽缓释剂;临床试验、患者偏好及经济考量
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:35-45. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S30627. Epub 2013 Jan 9.