School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical College, Dongguan, China.
Oral Oncol. 2012 Aug;48(8):737-46. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.01.025. Epub 2012 Feb 26.
Quality of life for patients with head and neck is now concerned worldwide, but the available QOL instruments are seldom and lack of Chinese culture. Therefore, this paper aimed to develop and validate a QOL instrument for patients with head and neck cancer, QLICP-HN. Using the programmed decision methods and the theory in instrument development, the QLICP-HN was developed and evaluated based on the data measuring QOL three times before and after treatment from a sample of 133 in-patients of head and neck cancer. The psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated by indicators such as validity and reliability coefficients: Cronbach α, Pearson r, standardized response mean. The statistical methods included Pearson correlation, multi-trait scaling analysis, factor analysis, cluster analysis and paired t test. The internal consistency α for the overall scale and domains is above 0.70 with the exception of the social function (0.65) and common symptom and side effect (0.66); the test-retest reliability for each domain and the overall scale is higher than 0.80; most correlation coefficients between each item and its domain are above 0.40; the scores differences between pre-treatment and post-treatment have statistical significance for three domains of physical, psychological, the specific, and the overall instrument, with higher SRM of 0.33, 0.59, 0.44 and 0.53. The QLICP-HN is of good validity, reliability and responsiveness, and can be used to assess quality of life for patients with head and neck cancer in China.
目前,全球都在关注头颈部癌症患者的生活质量,但可用的生活质量量表很少,且缺乏中国文化。因此,本研究旨在开发和验证一种适用于头颈部癌症患者的生活质量量表(QLICP-HN)。本研究采用程序化决策方法和量表开发理论,基于 133 例头颈部癌症住院患者治疗前后三次生活质量测量数据,开发并评价了 QLICP-HN。量表的心理测量学特性通过效度和信度系数等指标进行评估:克朗巴赫α系数、皮尔逊 r 系数、标准化反应均数。统计方法包括 Pearson 相关分析、多特质评分分析、因子分析、聚类分析和配对 t 检验。总体量表和各领域的内部一致性α值均大于 0.70,除社会功能(0.65)和常见症状及副作用(0.66)外;各领域和总体量表的重测信度均高于 0.80;各项目与其领域之间的相关系数大多在 0.40以上;治疗前后三个领域(身体、心理、特异性和总体量表)的评分差异具有统计学意义,三个领域的 SRM 分别为 0.33、0.59、0.44 和 0.53。QLICP-HN 具有良好的效度、信度和反应度,可用于评估中国头颈部癌症患者的生活质量。