Center for Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Br J Cancer. 2012 Mar 13;106(6):1021-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.28. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
Although the physician survey has become an important tool for oncology-focused health services research, such surveys often achieve low response rates. This mini-review reports the results of a structured review of the literature relating to increasing response rates for physician surveys, as well as our own experience from a survey of physicians as to their referral practices for suspected haematologic malignancy in the United States. PubMed and PsychINFO databases were used to identify methodological articles assessing factors that influence response rates for physician surveys; the results were tabulated and reviewed for trends. We also analysed the impact of a follow-up telephone call by a physician investigator to initial non-responders in our own mailed physician survey, comparing the characteristics of those who responded before vs after the call. The systematic review suggested that monetary incentives and paper (vs web or email) surveys increase response rates. In our own survey, follow-up telephone calls increased the response rate from 43.7% to 70.5%, with little discernible difference in the characteristics of early vs later responders. We conclude that in addition to monetary incentives and paper surveys, physician-to-physician follow-up telephone calls are an effective method to increase response rates in oncology-focused physician surveys.
虽然医师调查已成为肿瘤学为重点的卫生服务研究的重要工具,但此类调查的回应率往往很低。本迷你综述报告了一项针对提高医师调查回应率的文献的结构化综述的结果,以及我们自己在美国调查医师对疑似血液恶性肿瘤的转诊实践的经验。使用 PubMed 和 PsychINFO 数据库来确定评估影响医师调查回应率因素的方法学文章;将结果列表并审查趋势。我们还分析了医师调查员对最初未回复者进行后续电话随访对我们自己邮寄的医师调查的影响,比较了电话随访前后回复者的特征。系统综述表明,金钱激励和纸质(而非网络或电子邮件)调查可提高回应率。在我们自己的调查中,后续电话随访将回应率从 43.7%提高到 70.5%,早期和晚期回复者的特征几乎没有明显差异。我们的结论是,除了金钱激励和纸质调查外,医师对医师的后续电话随访也是提高以肿瘤学为重点的医师调查回应率的有效方法。