Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's and Children's Hospital, University of Adelaide, 72 King William Rd, North Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia.
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jul;38(7):396-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100542. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
Heuser and colleagues' survey of obstetricians provides a valuable insight into the current management of severe fetal anomalies in the United States. Their survey reveals two striking features - that counselling for these anomalies is far from neutral, and that there is significant variability between clinicians in their approach to management. In this commentary I outline the reasons to be concerned about both of these. Directiveness in counselling arguably represents a form of paternalism, and the evident variability in practice is likely the result of physician personal values. However, Heuser's survey may, by shining a light on practice, provide an important step towards a more consistent approach.
休泽尔及其同事对产科医生的调查为我们深入了解目前美国如何处理严重胎儿畸形提供了有价值的信息。他们的调查揭示了两个显著特点——这些畸形的咨询远非中立,而且临床医生在处理方法上存在显著差异。在这篇评论中,我概述了对这两个特点都需要关注的原因。咨询中的直接性可以说是一种家长式作风,而实践中的明显差异可能是医生个人价值观的结果。然而,休泽尔的调查通过揭示实践情况,可能朝着更一致的方法迈出了重要一步。