Desmet Charlotte, Fias Wim, Brass Marcel
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, Ghent, Belgium.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1172-84. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.645840. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
In a previous study, it was proposed that executing a task leads to task strengthening. In other words, task activation at the moment of response execution determines subsequent switch effects (Steinhauser & Hübner, 2006). The authors investigated this issue by comparing switch effects after task and response errors. However, the use of bivalent stimulus-response mappings might have obscured some of the effects. Therefore, we replicated the experiment using univalent stimulus-response mappings. With this adjusted design, which overcomes some shortcomings of the original study, we were able to replicate the finding of switch benefits after task errors. Closer inspection of the data showed the importance of preexecution processes on subsequent switch effects. In a second experiment, we further elaborated on these preexecution processes. More precisely, we investigated the effect of task preparation on subsequent switch effects. Taken together, our data extend current accounts of task switching by showing that the preparatory processes occurring before the response on trial n influence the switch cost on trial n + 1.
在之前的一项研究中,有人提出执行一项任务会导致任务强化。换句话说,反应执行时刻的任务激活决定了随后的转换效应(施泰因豪泽和许布纳,2006年)。作者通过比较任务错误和反应错误后的转换效应来研究这个问题。然而,使用二价刺激-反应映射可能掩盖了一些效应。因此,我们使用单价刺激-反应映射重复了该实验。通过这种经过调整的设计,克服了原研究的一些缺点,我们能够重复任务错误后转换益处的发现。对数据的仔细检查显示了执行前过程对随后转换效应的重要性。在第二个实验中,我们进一步阐述了这些执行前过程。更确切地说,我们研究了任务准备对随后转换效应的影响。综上所述,我们的数据扩展了当前关于任务转换的观点,表明在第n次试验的反应之前发生的准备过程会影响第n + 1次试验的转换成本。