Clari María Ángeles, Muñoz-Cobo Beatriz, Solano Carlos, Benet Isabel, Costa Elisa, Remigia María José, Bravo Dayana, Amat Paula, Navarro David
Microbiology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 May;19(5):791-6. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05633-11. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
The performance of the QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus (CMV) assay was compared to that of a flow cytometry intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) method for the detection of CMV-specific gamma interferon (IFN-γ)-producing CD8(+) T-cell responses in allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) recipients and for estimations of their magnitude and functionality. A total of 90 whole-blood specimens from 23 allo-SCT recipients was analyzed by both methods. Overall, the percentage of specimens that yielded concordant results by both methods was 68.8% (κ = 0.691; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.548 to 0.835), and the sensitivity of the QuantiFERON-CMV assay for the detection of positive IFN-γ T-cell responses (>0.2 IU/ml), taking the ICS method as the reference, was 76.3%. The magnitude of IFN-γ-producing CD8(+) T-cell responses to CMV-specific peptides measured with the QuantiFERON-CMV assay correlated significantly (σ = 0.695; P = <0.001) with that of the total IFN-γ-producing CD8(+) T cells and dual-functional (IFN-γ/tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α] [σ = 0.652; P = <0.001] and IFN-γ/CD107a [σ = 0.690; P = <0.001]) and trifunctional (IFN-γ/TNF-α/CD107a [σ = 0.679; P = >0.001]) CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses, as quantitated by ICS. In summary, the data indicated that the QuantiFERON-CMV assay is less sensitive than the ICS method for the detection of CMV-specific IFN-γ-producing CD8(+) T-cell responses in the allo-SCT setting. Nevertheless, it allowed the estimation of the total and polyfunctional CMV-specific IFN-γ-producing CD8(+) T-cell responses in specimens that tested positive by both methods.
将全血干扰素-巨细胞病毒(CMV)检测法与流式细胞术细胞内细胞因子染色(ICS)法的性能进行比较,以检测异基因干细胞移植(allo-SCT)受者中产生CMV特异性γ干扰素(IFN-γ)的CD8(+) T细胞反应,并评估其反应强度和功能。两种方法共分析了来自23名allo-SCT受者的90份全血标本。总体而言,两种方法得出一致结果的标本百分比为68.8%(κ = 0.691;95%置信区间[CI],0.548至0.835),以ICS法为参照,全血干扰素-CMV检测法检测阳性IFN-γ T细胞反应(>0.2 IU/ml)的灵敏度为76.3%。用全血干扰素-CMV检测法测得的对CMV特异性肽产生IFN-γ的CD8(+) T细胞反应强度,与通过ICS法定量的产生IFN-γ的总CD8(+) T细胞以及双功能(IFN-γ/肿瘤坏死因子α [TNF-α] [σ = 0.652;P = <0.001]和IFN-γ/CD107a [σ = 0.690;P = <0.001])和三功能(IFN-γ/TNF-α/CD107a [σ = 0.679;P = >0.001])CMV特异性CD8(+) T细胞反应强度显著相关(σ = 0.695;P = <0.001)。总之,数据表明在allo-SCT环境中,全血干扰素-CMV检测法在检测产生CMV特异性IFN-γ的CD8(+) T细胞反应方面不如ICS法敏感。然而,它能够对两种方法检测均为阳性的标本中产生CMV特异性IFN-γ的总CD8(+) T细胞反应和多功能CD8(+) T细胞反应进行评估。