• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋认同量表(LGBIS):构建验证、敏感性分析和其他心理测量特性。

Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS): construct validation, sensitivity analyses and other psychometric properties.

机构信息

Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.

出版信息

Span J Psychol. 2012 Mar;15(1):334-47. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n1.37340.

DOI:10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n1.37340
PMID:22379723
Abstract

According to Mohr and Fassinger (2006), identity is seen as both self-identification and collective identification with values, beliefs, traits or behaviours and attachments. Their Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) multidimensional identity model accounts for important variables regarding the constitution of identities. This model not only accesses numerous dimensions of the lives of LGB individuals, but is also based on a body of research that recognizes how LGB difficulties are caused by societal intolerance and marginalization (Mohr & Fassinger, 2000). The Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS; Kendra & Mohr, 2008) constitutes an operationalization of this multidimensional model, and the aim of this article is to present its construct validity by analysing its factor structure using a sample of Portuguese lesbian, gay and bisexual participants. Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, as well as from factor invariance analysis across sub-samples are presented. In a general way, the factor structure obtained in this study follows the original proposal of Kendra and Mohr's (2008) LGBIS. Moreover, scale sensitivity analyses are presented in order to check for eventual differences in the factor structure and/or factor intercorrelations regarding participant gender and sexual orientation. These results are then discussed in the light of LGB identity models.

摘要

根据 Mohr 和 Fassinger(2006)的观点,身份既被视为自我认同,也被视为对价值观、信仰、特征或行为以及依恋的集体认同。他们的同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGBT)多维身份模型解释了构成身份的重要变量。该模型不仅评估了 LGBT 个体生活的众多方面,而且还基于承认 LGBT 困难是由社会不容忍和边缘化引起的研究(Mohr & Fassinger,2000)。同性恋、双性恋和跨性别身份量表(LGBIS;Kendra & Mohr,2008)是对这种多维模型的操作化,本文的目的是通过分析葡萄牙女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋参与者的样本,来展示其结构效度。介绍了探索性和验证性因素分析的结果,以及子样本的因子不变性分析的结果。总的来说,本研究中获得的因子结构遵循 Kendra 和 Mohr(2008)的 LGBIS 的原始提议。此外,还进行了量表敏感性分析,以检查参与者的性别和性取向对因子结构和/或因子相关性的可能差异。然后根据 LGBT 身份模型讨论了这些结果。

相似文献

1
Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS): construct validation, sensitivity analyses and other psychometric properties.女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋认同量表(LGBIS):构建验证、敏感性分析和其他心理测量特性。
Span J Psychol. 2012 Mar;15(1):334-47. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n1.37340.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale-Turkish (LGBIS-TR).女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋身份量表 - 土耳其语版(LGBIS - TR)的心理测量特性。
J Homosex. 2017;64(12):1632-1649. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1249741. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
3
Revision and extension of a multidimensional measure of sexual minority identity: the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale.修订和扩展多维性少数群体身份测量工具:女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋身份量表。
J Couns Psychol. 2011 Apr;58(2):234-245. doi: 10.1037/a0022858.
4
The Association of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Facets With Smoking Dependence Motives.同性恋、双性恋和双性认同特征与吸烟依赖动机的关联。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Feb 7;20(3):388-392. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx061.
5
Identity profiles in lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth: the role of family influences.女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋青年的身份认同:家庭影响的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Mar;42(3):417-30. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9798-z. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
6
Sexual identity development among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: consistency and change over time.男同性恋、女同性恋和双性恋青少年的性取向认同发展:随时间的一致性与变化
J Sex Res. 2006 Feb;43(1):46-58. doi: 10.1080/00224490609552298.
7
Examining the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale Among Members of an Alternative Sexuality Special Interest Group.考察特殊性别兴趣群体成员的同性恋、双性恋身份量表。
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 May;47(4):1251-1264. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1120-4. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
8
Spiritual and Sexual Identity: Exploring Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Clients' Perspectives of Counseling.精神与性取向认同:探索女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋来访者对咨询的看法
J Homosex. 2016 Jun;63(6):783-807. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1112192. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
9
The health and wellbeing of Australian lesbian, gay and bisexual people: a systematic assessment using a longitudinal national sample.澳大利亚女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋人群的健康与幸福:使用纵向全国样本进行的系统评估。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019 Jun;43(3):281-287. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12855. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
10
Mental and Physical Health Needs of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Clients in Substance Abuse Treatment.药物滥用治疗中女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋患者的身心健康需求。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Nov;58:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological Adjustment Profiles of LGBTQ+ Young Adults Residing with Their Parents during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Study.LGBTQ+ 青年在 COVID-19 大流行期间与父母同住的心理调整特征:一项国际研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 11;20(4):3188. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043188.
2
Sexual Minority Identity and Mental Health Among Individuals on the Asexuality Spectrum in China: A Longitudinal Study.中国性少数认同与无性恋群体心理健康的纵向研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Oct;51(7):3627-3636. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02395-4. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
3
Minority Stress and Loneliness in a Global Sample of Sexual Minority Adults: The Roles of Social Anxiety, Social Inhibition, and Community Involvement.
少数群体应激与全球范围内性少数群体成年人的孤独感:社交焦虑、社交抑制和社区参与的作用。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 May;51(4):2269-2298. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02132-3. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
4
Health Disparities Among Exclusively Lesbian, Mostly Lesbian, and Bisexual Young Women.女同性恋、双性恋年轻女性中的健康差异。
LGBT Health. 2019 Nov/Dec;6(8):400-408. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2019.0055. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
5
Sexually transmitted infection testing practices among 'money boys' and general men who have sex with men in Shanghai, China: objective versus self-reported status.中国上海“男公关”与普通男男性行为者的性传播感染检测行为:客观状况与自我报告状况对比
Sex Health. 2014 Mar;11(1):94-6. doi: 10.1071/SH13199.