Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Span J Psychol. 2012 Mar;15(1):334-47. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n1.37340.
According to Mohr and Fassinger (2006), identity is seen as both self-identification and collective identification with values, beliefs, traits or behaviours and attachments. Their Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) multidimensional identity model accounts for important variables regarding the constitution of identities. This model not only accesses numerous dimensions of the lives of LGB individuals, but is also based on a body of research that recognizes how LGB difficulties are caused by societal intolerance and marginalization (Mohr & Fassinger, 2000). The Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS; Kendra & Mohr, 2008) constitutes an operationalization of this multidimensional model, and the aim of this article is to present its construct validity by analysing its factor structure using a sample of Portuguese lesbian, gay and bisexual participants. Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, as well as from factor invariance analysis across sub-samples are presented. In a general way, the factor structure obtained in this study follows the original proposal of Kendra and Mohr's (2008) LGBIS. Moreover, scale sensitivity analyses are presented in order to check for eventual differences in the factor structure and/or factor intercorrelations regarding participant gender and sexual orientation. These results are then discussed in the light of LGB identity models.
根据 Mohr 和 Fassinger(2006)的观点,身份既被视为自我认同,也被视为对价值观、信仰、特征或行为以及依恋的集体认同。他们的同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGBT)多维身份模型解释了构成身份的重要变量。该模型不仅评估了 LGBT 个体生活的众多方面,而且还基于承认 LGBT 困难是由社会不容忍和边缘化引起的研究(Mohr & Fassinger,2000)。同性恋、双性恋和跨性别身份量表(LGBIS;Kendra & Mohr,2008)是对这种多维模型的操作化,本文的目的是通过分析葡萄牙女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋参与者的样本,来展示其结构效度。介绍了探索性和验证性因素分析的结果,以及子样本的因子不变性分析的结果。总的来说,本研究中获得的因子结构遵循 Kendra 和 Mohr(2008)的 LGBIS 的原始提议。此外,还进行了量表敏感性分析,以检查参与者的性别和性取向对因子结构和/或因子相关性的可能差异。然后根据 LGBT 身份模型讨论了这些结果。