School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, 1014 W. 46th St., Norfolk, VA, 23509, USA.
Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 May;47(4):1251-1264. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1120-4. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
The present study contributes to a growing body of literature developing psychometrically and theoretically grounded measures of sexual orientation minority identity. We tested psychometric properties and construct validity of a 27-item measure, the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS). The sample consisted of 475 adult (178 male, 237 female, 16 male-to-female, 14 female-to-male, and 30 gender queer persons) members of a special interest group, the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom. Participants completed a health needs questionnaire. Prominent findings included (1) confirmatory factor-analytic, internal consistency, and inter-correlation patterns support two LGBIS factor structures; (2) men, compared primarily to women, reported elevated scores on Acceptance Concerns, Concealment Motivation, Difficulty Process, and Negative Identity; (3) queer-identifying persons tended to report low Concealment Motivation, and high Identity Affirmation and Identity Centrality scores; (4) experimenting/fluid-identifying individuals tended toward higher Identity Uncertainty and Negative Identity, and lower Identity Centrality scores; (5) LGB community involvement was negatively associated with Concealment Motivation, Identity Uncertainty, and Negative Identity, and positively associated with Identity Superiority, Identity Affirmation, and Identity Centrality scores; and (6) Acceptance Concerns, Identity Uncertainty, and Internalized Homonegativity displayed significant positive associations with such mental health symptoms as general anxiety and posttraumatic stress. The LGBIS represents a useful approach to evaluating sexual orientation minority identity. Implications for identity theory, research, and practice are provided.
本研究为不断发展的同性恋少数群体认同的心理测量和理论基础的文献做出了贡献。我们测试了 27 项的 Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS) 的心理测量学特性和结构有效性。样本由 475 名成人(178 名男性,237 名女性,16 名男性到女性,14 名女性到男性,和 30 名性别酷儿)组成,他们是一个特殊利益团体,即全国性自由联盟的成员。参与者完成了一个健康需求问卷。主要发现包括:(1)验证性因素分析、内部一致性和相互关联模式支持 LGBIS 的两个因素结构;(2)与女性相比,男性报告的接受关注、隐瞒动机、困难处理和消极认同得分较高;(3)酷儿认同者往往报告较低的隐瞒动机和较高的认同肯定和认同中心性得分;(4)实验/流动认同者往往具有较高的身份不确定性和消极认同,以及较低的身份中心性得分;(5)LGB 社区参与与隐瞒动机、身份不确定性和消极认同呈负相关,与身份优势、身份肯定和身份中心性呈正相关;(6)接受关注、身份不确定性和内化的同性恋负面认知与一般焦虑和创伤后应激等心理健康症状呈显著正相关。LGBIS 代表了评估同性恋少数群体认同的有用方法。为身份理论、研究和实践提供了启示。