Nielsen J A, Schlichting P, Dyremose E B, Riis P
Københavns Amts Sygehus i Herlev, Medicinsk afdeling C, og.
Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Oct 15;152(42):3066-8.
During a random week in 1987, 35% of the general practitioners from all of the municipalities in the County of Copenhagen participated in a questionnaire survey whose objective was to illuminate the quality, expedition time, and possible problems associated with the letter of discharge (LD), an important link between the primary and secondary medical services. It can be concluded that the expedition time for a large number of LD's from the hospitals of Copenhagen County is unacceptably lengthy. A surprisingly large number of patients visited their own general practitioner during the week following discharge with questions about the information which had been given them during their hospital stay, regardless of agreements for ambulatory monitoring at the department from which they had been discharged. A preliminary LD can, to a certain extent, alleviate the problems brought about by the lack af an LD but ought not to replace or delay the issuance of the actual LD, and is a more expensive solution. The quality and content of the LD can be evaluated generally as good, but could be improved if the recommended follow-up treatment and information to the patients and relatives is routinely carried out.
在1987年的随机一周内,哥本哈根郡所有市镇的35%的全科医生参与了一项问卷调查,其目的是阐明出院小结(LD)的质量、发送时间以及与之相关的可能问题,出院小结是初级和二级医疗服务之间的重要环节。可以得出结论,哥本哈根郡医院大量出院小结的发送时间长得令人无法接受。数量惊人的患者在出院后的一周内就因住院期间得到的信息问题拜访了自己的全科医生,尽管他们已与出院科室达成了门诊监测协议。初步出院小结在一定程度上可以缓解因缺少出院小结而带来的问题,但不应取代或推迟实际出院小结的发放,而且这是一种成本更高的解决方案。出院小结的质量和内容总体上可以评价为良好,但如果能按常规对患者及其亲属进行推荐的后续治疗和信息告知,还可以进一步改进。