• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[出院后的社会医疗合作]

[Social medical cooperation after discharge from the hospital].

作者信息

Hansen R

机构信息

Neuromedicinsk afdeling, Købehavns Amts Sygehus i Gentofte.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Aug 27;152(35):2501-4.

PMID:2402832
Abstract

This article accounts for how general practitioners and a group of neuromedical patients experience cooperation with hospital, social workers and the social authorities after discharge from hospital and their own wishes on this subject. The investigation reveals that communication is not optimal and that it should be intensified. The frequency of contact between the general practitioner and the patients is considerable and half of the patients desire follow-up treatment by the general practitioners. The majority of the general practitioners are willing to undertake follow-up treatment. The majority of the patients want their own general practitioner to be involved in solution of the social problems and the majority of the general practitioners want to be told by the social worker attached to the department about the problems which neuromedical patients may encounter on discharge from hospital. Less than half of the letters of discharge are sent to the patient's general practitioner within two weeks of discharge. By and large, the content of the letters of discharge is satisfactory with the exception about the information given to the patients. Although the patient clientele has serious social problems, cooperation between the general practitioner and the social authorities is defective. The general practitioners emphasize lack of special knowledge and defective understanding of the problems which neuromedical patients experience and defective interest in suggestions made by general practitioners to persons in the social administration. More than one third of the general practitioners would prefer cooperation with the social worker from the department during the follow-up period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本文阐述了全科医生以及一群神经医学患者在出院后与医院、社会工作者和社会当局合作的经历,以及他们在此方面的自身意愿。调查显示,沟通并非最佳状态,应予以加强。全科医生与患者之间的联系频率颇高,半数患者希望由全科医生进行后续治疗。大多数全科医生愿意承担后续治疗工作。大多数患者希望自己的全科医生参与解决社会问题,而大多数全科医生希望科室的社会工作者告知他们神经医学患者出院后可能遇到的问题。不到一半的出院信在出院两周内送达患者的全科医生手中。总体而言,出院信的内容令人满意,但在向患者提供的信息方面存在例外。尽管患者群体存在严重的社会问题,但全科医生与社会当局之间的合作存在缺陷。全科医生强调缺乏专业知识,对神经医学患者所经历的问题理解不足,且对全科医生向社会管理部门人员提出的建议缺乏兴趣。超过三分之一的全科医生更倾向于在后续阶段与科室的社会工作者合作。(摘要截取自250字)

相似文献

1
[Social medical cooperation after discharge from the hospital].[出院后的社会医疗合作]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Aug 27;152(35):2501-4.
2
[Social intervention at discharge. Cooperation between a hospital department, general practice and the social sector].出院时的社会干预。医院科室、全科医疗与社会部门之间的合作
Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Aug 27;152(35):2506-10.
3
[Patients' evaluation of their own discharge].[患者对自身出院情况的评估]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Aug 27;152(35):2504-6.
4
[Communication between general practitioners and hospitals].[全科医生与医院之间的沟通]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2000 Jan 31;162(5):648-53.
5
[Evaluation of the discharge summary by general practitioners. A questionnaire study].[全科医生对出院小结的评估。一项问卷调查研究]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Oct 15;152(42):3056-9.
6
[Communication between primary and secondary sector and its significance for patient care. Evaluation based on admission records and discharge letters of patients admitted acutely to a department of internal medicine].[初级医疗与二级医疗之间的沟通及其对患者护理的意义。基于内科急性入院患者的入院记录和出院小结的评估]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1997 Nov 24;159(48):7141-5.
7
[Epicrises from a department of medical gastroenterology].[来自医学胃肠病学科室的病历摘要]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1991 Jun 24;153(26):1868-70.
8
[Cross-sectorial cooperation regarding cancer patients in a recently started care program. Ideas and themes based on focus group interviews with general practitioners and oncologists].[在一个新启动的护理项目中关于癌症患者的跨部门合作。基于对全科医生和肿瘤学家的焦点小组访谈得出的想法和主题]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Apr 5;161(14):2074-8.
9
From emergency department to general practitioner: evaluating emergency department communication and service to general practitioners.从急诊科到全科医生:评估急诊科与全科医生之间的沟通及服务情况
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Aug;19(4):346-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00983.x.
10
[Diagnosis and treatment in general practice. 4. General practitioners' knowledge of their patients].[全科医疗中的诊断与治疗。4. 全科医生对其患者的了解]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1989 Jan 16;151(3):157-61.