Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.024. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
PURPOSE: The present study evaluates the influence of portal vein (PV) vs. inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombosis sites on the effectiveness of external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macrovascular invasion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed 181 HCC patients with PV and/or IVC tumor thrombi who were referred for EBRT at our institution between 2000 and 2009. EBRT was designed to focus on the tumor thrombi with or without primary intrahepatic tumors to deliver a median total conventional dose of 50 Gy (range, 30-60 Gy). Predictors of survival were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The median survival was 10.2, 7.4, 17.4, and 8.5 months for patients with PV branch, PV trunk, IVC, and PV plus IVC tumor thrombosis, respectively. Unfavorable pretreatment predictors were associated by multivariate analysis with lower albumin and higher α-fetoprotein levels, poorer Child-Pugh liver function classification, multiple intrahepatic foci, lymph node metastases, thrombus location, less chance to receive post-EBRT transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and the two-dimensional EBRT technique. In comparison to patients with PV tumor thrombosis, patients with IVC thrombi had a higher occurrence of solitary intrahepatic lesions (p = 0.027), well-controlled intrahepatic tumors (p < 0.001), and a better response to EBRT (p < 0.001), and they were more likely to receive post-EBRT TACE (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: In HCC, patients with IVC thrombus treated with EBRT had a better response rate and longer survival than those with PV thrombus.
目的:本研究评估了门静脉(PV)与下腔静脉(IVC)肿瘤血栓部位对伴有大血管侵犯的晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者行外照射放疗(EBRT)效果的影响。
方法和材料:我们回顾性分析了 2000 年至 2009 年期间在我院行 EBRT 的 181 例伴有 PV 和/或 IVC 肿瘤血栓的 HCC 患者。EBRT 设计旨在聚焦于肿瘤血栓,无论是否存在原发性肝内肿瘤,以提供中位数为 50Gy 的常规总剂量(范围 30-60Gy)。使用单变量和多变量分析来确定生存预测因素。
结果:PV 分支、PV 干、IVC 和 PV+IVC 肿瘤血栓患者的中位生存期分别为 10.2、7.4、17.4 和 8.5 个月。多变量分析显示,不良的预处理预测因素与较低的白蛋白和较高的甲胎蛋白水平、较差的 Child-Pugh 肝功能分级、多个肝内病灶、淋巴结转移、血栓位置、接受 EBRT 后经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)的机会较少以及二维 EBRT 技术相关。与 PV 肿瘤血栓患者相比,IVC 血栓患者更易出现孤立性肝内病变(p=0.027)、更好控制的肝内肿瘤(p<0.001)和对 EBRT 的更好反应(p<0.001),且更有可能接受 EBRT 后 TACE(p=0.033)。
结论:在 HCC 中,与 PV 血栓患者相比,接受 EBRT 治疗的 IVC 血栓患者的反应率更高,生存期更长。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012-2-28
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011-5-27
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009-11-18
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005-11-15
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023
J Liver Cancer. 2023-3
Korean J Radiol. 2022-12
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022-10
Front Oncol. 2022-4-27