Suppr超能文献

SAMMPRIS 试验入组患者接受颅内血管成形术和/或支架置入术治疗后的术后卒中和死亡率。

Rate of postprocedural stroke and death in SAMMPRIS trial-eligible patients treated with intracranial angioplasty and/or stent placement in practice.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2012 Jul;71(1):68-73. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182518575.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The SAMMPRIS (Stenting vs Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis) trial, comparing aggressive medical vs stent treatment in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis, was halted after a 14% stroke and death rate was observed in the stent-treated group.

OBJECTIVE

To study the 30-day stroke and death rate in intracranial angioplasty- and stent-treated patients meeting SAMMPRIS trial eligibility criteria.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 96 patients treated with intracranial angioplasty and stent placement at 3 university-affiliated institutions was performed. Patients were divided into SAMMPRIS trial eligible and ineligible groups based on inclusion and exclusion criteria for the SAMMPRIS trial.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were determined to be SAMMPRIS eligible and 27 patients were ineligible. The SAMMPRIS-eligible group was divided into angioplasty- and stent-treated subgroups (30 and 39 patients, respectively). The overall 30-day postprocedure stroke and death rate was 7.2% in the SAMMPRIS-eligible group and 7.4% in the SAMMPRIS-ineligible group (P = .97). The 30-day postprocedure stroke and death rate was 3.3% in the SAMMPRIS-eligible, angioplasty-treated subgroup and 10.2% in the SAMMPRIS-eligible, stent-treated subgroup (P = .27).

CONCLUSION

The overall 30-day postprocedure stroke and death rate in our study was lower in both SAMMPRIS-eligible and -ineligible groups than the reported 14% stroke and death rate in the SAMMPRIS trial. We hypothesize that a more judicious use of primary angioplasty may be responsible for better postprocedure outcomes and should be considered an acceptable treatment in future trials.

摘要

背景

SAMMPRIS(支架置入与强化药物治疗预防颅内狭窄再发卒中)试验比较了症状性颅内狭窄患者的强化药物治疗与支架治疗,在支架治疗组观察到 14%的卒中和死亡率后被终止。

目的

研究符合 SAMMPRIS 试验入选标准的颅内血管成形术和支架治疗患者的 30 天卒中和死亡率。

方法

对 3 所大学附属医院的 96 例行颅内血管成形术和支架置入的患者进行回顾性分析。根据 SAMMPRIS 试验的纳入和排除标准,将患者分为符合和不符合 SAMMPRIS 试验的两组。

结果

69 例患者被确定为符合 SAMMPRIS 试验标准,27 例患者不符合。SAMMPRIS 试验符合标准的患者分为血管成形术和支架治疗亚组(分别为 30 例和 39 例)。SAMMPRIS 试验符合标准组的总体 30 天术后卒中和死亡率为 7.2%,SAMMPRIS 试验不符合标准组为 7.4%(P =.97)。SAMMPRIS 试验符合标准、血管成形术治疗亚组的 30 天术后卒中和死亡率为 3.3%,SAMMPRIS 试验符合标准、支架治疗亚组为 10.2%(P =.27)。

结论

我们的研究中,符合和不符合 SAMMPRIS 试验标准的两组的总体 30 天术后卒中和死亡率均低于 SAMMPRIS 试验报告的 14%的卒中和死亡率。我们推测,更谨慎地使用直接血管成形术可能是导致术后结果更好的原因,在未来的试验中应考虑将其作为一种可接受的治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验