• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学治疗和支架治疗是否得到了公平比较?SAMMPRIS 试验停止招募后的反响。

Have medical therapy and stenting been fairly compared? A repercussion upon termination of recruitment in the SAMMPRIS trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Division of Neurology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2011 Aug;6(4):312-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00634.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00634.x
PMID:21745340
Abstract

The recruitment of the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent stroke in Intracranial Stenosis, an National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-funded clinic trial evaluating aggressive medical therapy vs. adjunctive intracranial angioplasty and stenting in high-grade symptomatic intracranial stenosis, was prematurely terminated by the study Data Safety Monitoring Board. The significantly higher 30-day stroke and death rate in the stenting arm led to a conclusion from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Executive Committee that aggressive medical management alone was superior to angioplasty combined with stenting. The authors discussed on the potential pitfalls, which may render this conclusion premature and explained the needs for continuing efforts in investigating treatment for intracranial stenosis.

摘要

血管内支架成形术和强化药物治疗预防颅内狭窄患者卒中复发的临床试验,该试验由美国国立神经病学与卒中研究院资助,旨在评估强化药物治疗与颅内血管成形术和支架置入术联合治疗重度症状性颅内狭窄的疗效。由于支架治疗组 30 天内卒中发生率和死亡率显著升高,美国国立神经病学与卒中研究院和执行委员会得出结论,强化药物治疗单独应用优于血管成形术联合支架置入术。本文作者讨论了导致这一结论可能不成熟的潜在陷阱,并解释了继续努力研究颅内狭窄治疗方法的必要性。

相似文献

1
Have medical therapy and stenting been fairly compared? A repercussion upon termination of recruitment in the SAMMPRIS trial.医学治疗和支架治疗是否得到了公平比较?SAMMPRIS 试验停止招募后的反响。
Int J Stroke. 2011 Aug;6(4):312-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00634.x.
2
Does the Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Therapy Trial Support Stenting for Subgroups With Intracranial Stenosis?支架置入术与强化药物治疗试验是否支持对颅内狭窄亚组进行支架置入?
Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3282-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009846. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
3
Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial.高风险颅内动脉狭窄患者(SAMMPRIS)强化药物治疗联合或不联合支架置入的疗效:一项随机试验的最终结果。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
4
Rate of postprocedural stroke and death in SAMMPRIS trial-eligible patients treated with intracranial angioplasty and/or stent placement in practice.SAMMPRIS 试验入组患者接受颅内血管成形术和/或支架置入术治疗后的术后卒中和死亡率。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Jul;71(1):68-73. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182518575.
5
Revisiting angioplasty without stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis after the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis (SAMMPRIS) study.SAMMPRIS 研究后,对于症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄患者,血管成形术不伴支架置入治疗能否替代支架置入和强化药物治疗预防颅内狭窄患者卒中复发。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Dec;71(6):1103-10. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318271bcb8.
6
Design of the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis trial.颅内狭窄患者支架置入和强化药物治疗预防卒中复发试验的设计。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011 Jul-Aug;20(4):357-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.05.001.
7
Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin after carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联合抗血小板治疗。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2001 Dec;13(12):767-71.
8
Editorial - do not throw the baby out with the bathwater….社论——勿因噎废食……
Interv Neuroradiol. 2011 Dec;17(4):409-10. doi: 10.1177/159101991101700401. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
9
Current status of the management of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: the rationale for a randomized trial of medical therapy and intracranial stenting.症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病管理的现状:药物治疗与颅内支架置入术随机试验的原理。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2009 Jul;1(1):35-9. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2009.000125. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
10
Medical management trumps stenting for intracranial arterial stenosis.对于颅内动脉狭窄,药物治疗优于支架置入术。
Am J Nurs. 2011 Dec;111(12):16. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000408170.19984.68.

引用本文的文献

1
Fractional Flow Assessment for the Evaluation of Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Feasibility Study.用于评估颅内动脉粥样硬化的血流分数评估:一项可行性研究。
Interv Neurol. 2016 Jun;5(1-2):65-75. doi: 10.1159/000444333. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
2
Concurrent stenoses: A common etiology of stroke in Asians.合并狭窄:亚洲人中风的常见病因。
World J Clin Cases. 2014 Jun 16;2(6):201-5. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i6.201.
3
Response to critique of the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial by Abou-Chebl and Steinmetz.
对阿布-谢布尔和斯坦梅茨对颅内狭窄支架置入与积极药物治疗预防复发性卒中(SAMMPRIS)试验的批评的回应。
Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2806-9. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.112.661041.
4
Recurrent inflammatory stenosis of the M1 segment: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.
Neuroradiology. 2012 May;54(5):529-32. doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-0964-x. Epub 2011 Sep 27.