Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Spring;11(1):17-25. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-08-0064.
Despite substantial evidence that writing can be an effective tool to promote student learning and engagement, writing-to-learn (WTL) practices are still not widely implemented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, particularly at research universities. Two major deterrents to progress are the lack of a community of science faculty committed to undertaking and applying the necessary pedagogical research, and the absence of a conceptual framework to systematically guide study designs and integrate findings. To address these issues, we undertook an initiative, supported by the National Science Foundation and sponsored by the Reinvention Center, to build a community of WTL/STEM educators who would undertake a heuristic review of the literature and formulate a conceptual framework. In addition to generating a searchable database of empirically validated and promising WTL practices, our work lays the foundation for multi-university empirical studies of the effectiveness of WTL practices in advancing student learning and engagement.
尽管有大量证据表明写作可以成为促进学生学习和参与的有效工具,但在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)学科中,尤其是在研究型大学中,写作促进学习(WTL)的实践仍然没有得到广泛实施。阻碍其发展的两个主要因素是缺乏致力于进行和应用必要的教学研究的科学教师群体,以及缺乏系统指导研究设计和整合研究结果的概念框架。为了解决这些问题,我们在美国国家科学基金会的支持下,发起了一项由革新研究中心赞助的计划,旨在建立一个 WTL/STEM 教育工作者社区,他们将对文献进行启发式回顾,并制定一个概念框架。除了生成一个可搜索的经过实证验证和有前途的 WTL 实践数据库外,我们的工作还为多所大学开展 WTL 实践在促进学生学习和参与方面的有效性的实证研究奠定了基础。