• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PORTAAL:一种课堂观察工具,用于评估在大型科学、技术、工程和数学课程中基于证据的主动学习教学实践。

PORTAAL: A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Classes.

作者信息

Eddy Sarah L, Converse Mercedes, Wenderoth Mary Pat

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1800

Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1800.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Summer;14(2):14:ar23. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095
PMID:26033871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4477739/
Abstract

There is extensive evidence that active learning works better than a completely passive lecture. Despite this evidence, adoption of these evidence-based teaching practices remains low. In this paper, we offer one tool to help faculty members implement active learning. This tool identifies 21 readily implemented elements that have been shown to increase student outcomes related to achievement, logic development, or other relevant learning goals with college-age students. Thus, this tool both clarifies the research-supported elements of best practices for instructor implementation of active learning in the classroom setting and measures instructors' alignment with these practices. We describe how we reviewed the discipline-based education research literature to identify best practices in active learning for adult learners in the classroom and used these results to develop an observation tool (Practical Observation Rubric To Assess Active Learning, or PORTAAL) that documents the extent to which instructors incorporate these practices into their classrooms. We then use PORTAAL to explore the classroom practices of 25 introductory biology instructors who employ some form of active learning. Overall, PORTAAL documents how well aligned classrooms are with research-supported best practices for active learning and provides specific feedback and guidance to instructors to allow them to identify what they do well and what could be improved.

摘要

有大量证据表明,主动学习比完全被动的讲座效果更好。尽管有这些证据,但基于证据的教学实践的采用率仍然很低。在本文中,我们提供了一种工具来帮助教师实施主动学习。该工具识别出21个易于实施的要素,这些要素已被证明能提高与大学生成绩、逻辑发展或其他相关学习目标相关的学生成果。因此,该工具既阐明了在课堂环境中教师实施主动学习的最佳实践中得到研究支持的要素,又衡量了教师与这些实践的契合度。我们描述了我们如何回顾基于学科的教育研究文献,以确定课堂上成人学习者主动学习的最佳实践,并利用这些结果开发了一种观察工具(评估主动学习的实践观察量表,或PORTAAL),该量表记录了教师将这些实践融入课堂的程度。然后,我们使用PORTAAL来探索25位采用某种形式主动学习的生物学入门课程教师的课堂实践。总体而言,PORTAAL记录了课堂与主动学习的研究支持的最佳实践的契合程度,并为教师提供具体的反馈和指导,使他们能够确定自己做得好的地方以及可以改进的地方。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6936/4477739/55daf64a190d/ar23fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6936/4477739/db05f7c61cdb/ar23fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6936/4477739/af6ea852bb16/ar23fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6936/4477739/aad401be4012/ar23fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6936/4477739/c391c1dee06a/ar23fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6936/4477739/55daf64a190d/ar23fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6936/4477739/db05f7c61cdb/ar23fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6936/4477739/af6ea852bb16/ar23fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6936/4477739/aad401be4012/ar23fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6936/4477739/c391c1dee06a/ar23fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6936/4477739/55daf64a190d/ar23fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
PORTAAL: A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Classes.PORTAAL:一种课堂观察工具,用于评估在大型科学、技术、工程和数学课程中基于证据的主动学习教学实践。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Summer;14(2):14:ar23. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
2
An exploration of the relationship between active learning and student motivation in STEM: a mixed methods study.主动学习与 STEM 学生动机关系的探索:混合方法研究。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2024 Sep 1;48(3):621-638. doi: 10.1152/advan.00247.2022. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
3
The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): a new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices.本科理工科课堂观察协议(COPUS):一种描述大学理工科课堂教学实践的新工具。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Winter;12(4):618-27. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154.
4
A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Instructional Beliefs and Practices in Gateway Courses to the Sciences.多机构分析科学入门课程中的教学信念和实践。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Jun;18(2):ar26. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-12-0257.
5
The Classroom Discourse Observation Protocol (CDOP): A quantitative method for characterizing teacher discourse moves in undergraduate STEM learning environments.课堂话语观察协议(CDOP):一种用于描述本科 STEM 学习环境中教师话语行为的定量方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 17;14(7):e0219019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219019. eCollection 2019.
6
A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM.混合方法研究在 STEM 中点击器实施风格。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Jun;17(2):ar30. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-08-0180.
7
A campus-wide study of STEM courses: new perspectives on teaching practices and perceptions.一项关于STEM课程的全校范围研究:教学实践与认知的新视角
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Winter;13(4):624-35. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0108.
8
The best of both worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP observation protocols to easily and reliably measure various levels of reformed instructional practice.两全其美:以COPUS和RTOP观察协议为基础,轻松、可靠地衡量各种层面的改良教学实践。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Summer;14(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168.
9
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.主动学习可提高学生在科学、工程和数学领域的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111. Epub 2014 May 12.
10
"What Will I Experience in My College STEM Courses?" An Investigation of Student Predictions about Instructional Practices in Introductory Courses.《我在大学 STEM 课程中会有什么体验?》——对学生对入门课程教学实践的预测的调查。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Dec;18(4):ar60. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-05-0084.

引用本文的文献

1
Visualizing Inequities: A Step Toward Equitable Student Outcomes.可视化不平等:实现公平学生成果的一步。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):es9. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0086.
2
The role of a team psychological safety feeling in teamwork in the classroom.团队心理安全感在课堂团队合作中的作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 7;10(18):e37618. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37618. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
3
Eight Indicators for Measuring Equitable Student Success in STEM.衡量STEM领域学生公平成功的八项指标。

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology.运用有效的学习技巧提高学生的学习效果:认知和教育心理学的有前景方向。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Jan;14(1):4-58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266.
2
Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms.多个基础生物学课堂中成绩和参与度方面的性别差异。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Fall;13(3):478-92. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204.
3
Getting under the hood: how and for whom does increasing course structure work?
Change. 2024;56(3):4-14. doi: 10.1080/00091383.2024.2348425. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
4
Time spent on active learning activities does not necessarily correlate with student exam performance: a controlled case study.花在主动学习活动上的时间不一定与学生的考试成绩相关:一项对照案例研究。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024 Dec 12;25(3):e0007324. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00073-24. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
5
An exploration of the relationship between active learning and student motivation in STEM: a mixed methods study.主动学习与 STEM 学生动机关系的探索:混合方法研究。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2024 Sep 1;48(3):621-638. doi: 10.1152/advan.00247.2022. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
6
Assessing Community College Biology Student Perceptions of Being Called on in Class.评估社区大学生对课堂点名的看法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Dec;22(4):ar51. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-05-0068.
7
Rethinking Learning Experience: How Generally Perceived Life Stress Influences Students' Course Perceptions in Different Learning Environments.重新思考学习体验:普遍感知到的生活压力如何在不同学习环境中影响学生对课程的认知。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Aug 12;13(8):1491-1504. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13080109.
8
COPUS-TA: An "Entry-Level" Peer Observation Tool to Support Teaching Assistant Professional Pedagogical Development.COPUS-TA:一种支持助教专业教学发展的“入门级”同行观察工具。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023 May 16;24(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00191-22. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Use of Active Learning During Emergency Remote Teaching in COVID-19 Pandemic.在新冠疫情期间紧急远程教学中运用主动学习法
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Jun 23;33(4):913-924. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01816-w. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Evading Race: STEM Faculty Struggle to Acknowledge Racialized Classroom Events.逃避种族问题:STEM 教师努力承认课堂事件中的种族问题。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Mar;22(1):ar14. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-06-0104.
深入探究:增加课程结构对谁有效以及如何起作用?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Fall;13(3):453-68. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050.
4
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.主动学习可提高学生在科学、工程和数学领域的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111. Epub 2014 May 12.
5
Teaching and physics education research: bridging the gap.教学与物理教育研究:弥合鸿沟。
Rep Prog Phys. 2014 Mar;77(3):032401. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/3/032401. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
6
Understanding clicker discussions: student reasoning and the impact of instructional cues.理解点击器讨论:学生推理及教学提示的影响
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Winter;12(4):645-54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-05-0090.
7
Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: lack of training, time, incentives, and...tensions with professional identity?教师教学变革的障碍:缺乏培训、时间、激励措施以及……与职业身份的冲突?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Winter;11(4):339-46. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163.
8
Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics.女性为何选择退出?归属感与数学领域的女性代表性
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Apr;102(4):700-17. doi: 10.1037/a0026659. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
9
Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology.增加课程结构可以提高生物学入门课程的成绩。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Summer;10(2):175-86. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-08-0105.
10
Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions.同伴讨论与教师讲解相结合能提高学生课堂概念问题学习效果。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Spring;10(1):55-63. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-08-0101.