• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[大庆市生态环境脆弱性的空间格局]

[Spatial patterns of eco-environmental vulnerability in Daqing City].

作者信息

Li Jing, Zhang Ping-Yu, Li He, Su Fei

机构信息

Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130012, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Dec;22(12):3279-84.

PMID:22384598
Abstract

This paper established an index system for the assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in Daqing City, from the aspects of sensitivity and response capability, and aiming at the major disturbances from crude oil exploitation and production activities. The improved entropy method was adopted to evaluate the weights of the indices, and the spatial patterns of eco-environment vulnerability in the City were analyzed, according to the model functions. In 2009, the more sensitive areas of the eco-environment in the City were mainly concentrated in the intensive regions of crude oil exploitation, processing, and petrochemical industry, and the ecological problems such as land salinization were the secondary causes for this higher sensitivity. The overall response capability of the eco-environment to unfavorable disturbances was relatively high, which reduced the eco-environment vulnerability to some extent. There was a great spatial difference in the eco-environment vulnerability in the City. The vulnerability was comparatively higher in the districts of Honggang, Sartu and Longfeng, with the degree being 0.80, 0.71 and 0.68, but lower in Ranghulu and Datong, with the degree of 0.20 and 0.04, respectively.

摘要

本文从敏感性和响应能力方面,针对原油开采与生产活动产生的主要干扰,构建了大庆市生态环境脆弱性评价指标体系。采用改进熵权法计算各指标权重,并依据模型函数分析了该市生态环境脆弱性的空间格局。2009年,该市生态环境敏感性较高的区域主要集中在原油开采、加工及石化产业密集区,土地盐碱化等生态问题是造成较高敏感性的次要原因。生态环境对不利干扰的整体响应能力相对较高,在一定程度上降低了生态环境脆弱性。该市生态环境脆弱性存在较大的空间差异。红岗区、萨尔图区和龙凤区的脆弱性相对较高,程度分别为0.80、0.71和0.68,而让胡路区和大同区的脆弱性较低,程度分别为0.20和0.04。

相似文献

1
[Spatial patterns of eco-environmental vulnerability in Daqing City].[大庆市生态环境脆弱性的空间格局]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Dec;22(12):3279-84.
2
Spatial-temporal pattern evolution and driving force analysis of ecological environment vulnerability in Panzhihua City.攀枝花市生态环境脆弱性的时空格局演变及驱动力分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(6):7151-7166. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11013-6. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
[Vulnerability assessment of eco-environment in Yimeng mountainous area of Shandong Province based on SRP conceptual model].基于SRP概念模型的山东省沂蒙山区生态环境脆弱性评估
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Aug;22(8):2084-90.
4
[Regional eco-economic resilience of Changzhi city].[长治市区域生态经济韧性]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2009 Jul;20(7):1608-12.
5
[Ecological security assessment of Baishan City in Jilin Province based on DPSIR].基于DPSIR模型的吉林省白山市生态安全评价
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Jan;22(1):189-95.
6
[Vulnerability of eco-economy in northern slope region of Tianshan Mountains].[天山北坡地区生态经济的脆弱性]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2008 Apr;19(4):859-65.
7
Assessment of ecological vulnerability of resource-based cities based on entropy-set pair analysis.基于熵-集对分析的资源型城市生态脆弱性评价。
Environ Technol. 2021 May;42(12):1874-1884. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2019.1683611. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
[Spatial and temporal changes of the ecological vulnerability in a serious soil erosion area, Southern China.].[中国南方严重水土流失区生态脆弱性的时空变化]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Mar;27(3):735-745. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201603.022.
9
[Ecological sensitivity of Shanghai City based on GIS spatial analysis].基于GIS空间分析的上海市生态敏感性
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2010 Jul;21(7):1805-12.
10
Ecological risk assessment of land use change in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone, China.中国鄱阳湖生态经济区土地利用变化的生态风险评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Jan 14;10(1):328-46. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10010328.