Animal Population Health Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1678, USA.
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Jun 1;105(1-2):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
Breeding-soundness examination (BSE) and eradication of Brucella ovis infection in rams are critical components of flock-health programs. The aims of this retrospective, cross-sectional study were to describe the results of BSE in a large sample of rams in the Western USA and to determine the association between BSE outcome and the semen collection method (penis manually extended vs. retained in the preputial cavity), ram body-condition score (BCS), the presence of ulcerative posthitis, and the size of the flock of origin. We evaluated the first BSE in a given year for rams from Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah, USA, from 2000 through 2007. Breeding-soundness examination consisted of physical examination, scrotal circumference and BCS measurement, semen collection by electroejaculation, and microscopic examination of semen motility, morphology, and leukocyte concentration. We assigned a reason for failure to each failed BSE and used multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions to measure associations between ram and flock variables and the risk or reason for failure on BSE. A non-random, owner-selected subset of rams was tested for antibodies to B. ovis by serum indirect ELISA (iELISA). The Rogan-Gladen corrected B. ovis seroprevalence was measured. Of the 14,667 BSEs performed on 11,804 rams, 29.0% were classified as "failed;" the most common reason for failure was substandard semen parameters (43.8%). Breeding-soundness examinations were more likely to have been categorized as failure for inflammatory causes when performed on rams from medium-sized flocks (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1, 2.3) and large flocks (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0, 1.9) (P=0.02), suggesting that larger flocks are at higher risk of contagious diseases. The adjusted seroprevalence of B. ovis antibodies among tested rams in this study was 10.0%. Of 233 rams seropositive to B. ovis, 125 (53.6%) were subclinical, a finding that supports the importance of this test in ram BSE. We found that emaciation in rams was associated with an increased risk of BSE failure from substandard semen parameters (P<0.001), but ulcerative posthitis and the semen collection method were not (P=0.09 and 0.34, respectively). However, collection of semen with the penis retained in the preputial cavity resulted in greater odds of leukospermia relative to semen collection with the penis extended (OR 4.1; 95% CI 2.9, 5.9; P<0.001), presumably from contamination of the semen sample with preputial leukocytes. For ram BSE, therefore, semen collection with the penis manually extended from the sheath is recommended to limit leukocyte contamination of the sample.
种畜健康检查(BSE)和消除绵羊布鲁氏菌病感染是羊群健康计划的重要组成部分。本回顾性、横断面研究的目的是描述在美国西部大量公羊的 BSE 检查结果,并确定 BSE 检查结果与精液采集方法(阴茎手动伸出与保留在包皮腔中)、公羊体况评分(BCS)、溃疡性龟头炎的存在以及其来源羊群的大小之间的关系。我们评估了 2000 年至 2007 年期间来自美国科罗拉多州、怀俄明州和犹他州的公羊在某一年的首次 BSE 检查。BSE 包括体格检查、阴囊周长和 BCS 测量、电刺激采集精液和精液运动、形态和白细胞浓度的显微镜检查。我们为每个失败的 BSE 分配了一个失败原因,并使用多变量逻辑和泊松回归来衡量公羊和羊群变量与 BSE 失败的风险或原因之间的关系。通过血清间接酶联免疫吸附试验(iELISA)对随机选择的部分公羊进行了针对绵羊布鲁氏菌(B. ovis)抗体的检测。测量了罗根-格拉登校正的 B. ovis 血清流行率。在对 11804 只公羊进行的 14667 次 BSE 检查中,29.0%被归类为“失败”;最常见的失败原因是精液参数不标准(43.8%)。当对来自中等规模羊群(OR 1.6;95%CI 1.1, 2.3)和大规模羊群(OR 1.4;95%CI 1.0, 1.9)的公羊进行 BSE 检查时,更有可能将其归类为炎症原因导致的失败(P=0.02),这表明较大的羊群更容易受到传染性疾病的影响。在这项研究中,接受检测的公羊的 B. ovis 抗体血清阳性率为 10.0%。在 233 只 B. ovis 血清阳性的公羊中,有 125 只(53.6%)为无症状感染,这一发现支持该检测在公羊 BSE 中的重要性。我们发现,公羊消瘦与精液参数不标准导致 BSE 失败的风险增加有关(P<0.001),但溃疡性龟头炎和精液采集方法则无关(P=0.09 和 0.34)。然而,与阴茎伸出时采集精液相比,将阴茎保留在包皮腔内采集精液会导致白细胞精子症的可能性增加(OR 4.1;95%CI 2.9, 5.9;P<0.001),这可能是由于精液样本受到包皮白细胞的污染。因此,对于公羊 BSE,建议手动将阴茎从鞘中伸出以限制样本中白细胞的污染。