Suppr超能文献

窒息性和室颤性心脏骤停中心肌损伤和线粒体损伤的差异。

The difference in myocardial injuries and mitochondrial damages between asphyxial and ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrests.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Medical College and Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;30(8):1540-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) and asphyxia account for most cardiac arrests but differ in cardiac arrest course, neurologic deficit, and myocardial damage. In VF resuscitation, cardiac mitochondria were known to be damaged via excess generation of reactive oxygen species. This study evaluated the difference of cardiac mitochondrial damages between VF and asphyxial cardiac arrests.

METHODS

In the VF + electrical shock (ES) group, VF was induced and untreated for 5 minutes, followed by 1 minute of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and 1 ES of 5 J. Animals were killed immediately after ES. In the asphyxia group, cardiac arrest was induced by airway obstruction, and then pulselessness was maintained for 5 minutes, followed by 1 minute of CPR. The animals were killed immediately after CPR. The histology and ultrastructural changes of myocardium and complex activities and respiration of mitochondria were evaluated. The mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening was measured based on mitochondrial swelling rate.

RESULTS

The histopathologic examinations showed myocardial necrosis and mitochondrial damage in both cardiac arrests. Instead of regional damages of myocardium in the VF + ES group, the myocardial injury in the asphyxia group distributed diffusely. The asphyxia group demonstrated more severe mitochondrial damage than the VF + ES group, which had a faster mitochondrial swelling rate, more decreased cytochrome c oxidase activity, and more impaired respiration.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VF and asphyxial cardiac arrests caused myocardial injuries and mitochondrial damages. Asphyxial cardiac arrest presented more diffuse myocardial injuries and more severe mitochondrial damages than VF cardiac arrest.

摘要

简介

心室颤动(VF)和窒息导致大多数心搏骤停,但在心脏骤停过程、神经功能缺损和心肌损伤方面存在差异。在 VF 复苏中,已知心脏线粒体通过过量产生活性氧而受损。本研究评估了 VF 和窒息性心搏骤停之间心脏线粒体损伤的差异。

方法

在 VF + 电休克(ES)组中,诱导 VF 并持续 5 分钟,然后进行 1 分钟心肺复苏(CPR)和 1 次 5J 的 ES。ES 后立即处死动物。在窒息组中,通过气道阻塞诱导心搏骤停,然后保持无脉 5 分钟,然后进行 1 分钟 CPR。CPR 后立即处死动物。评估心肌的组织学和超微结构变化以及线粒体的复合活性和呼吸。根据线粒体肿胀率测量线粒体通透性转换孔的开放。

结果

组织病理学检查显示两种心脏骤停均有心肌坏死和线粒体损伤。在 VF + ES 组中,心肌损伤呈区域性,而在窒息组中,心肌损伤呈弥漫性分布。与 VF + ES 组相比,窒息组的线粒体损伤更严重,线粒体肿胀率更快,细胞色素 c 氧化酶活性下降更多,呼吸功能受损更严重。

结论

VF 和窒息性心搏骤停均导致心肌损伤和线粒体损伤。窒息性心搏骤停比 VF 心搏骤停更广泛地引起心肌损伤,并且线粒体损伤更严重。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验