California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA Beacon Clinical Research, Brockton, MA, USA Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA Department of Anesthesiology & Peri-Operative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Pain. 2012 Apr;153(4):862-868. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that neuronal nicotinic receptor (NNR) agonists may be a novel and effective therapy for numerous painful conditions. Analgesic efficacy and safety of the highly selective α(4)β(2) NNR agonist ABT-894 was evaluated in 2 separate randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). Study 1 (280 patients randomized) tested 1, 2, and 4 mg ABT-894 twice daily compared with placebo and 60 mg duloxetine once per day over 8 weeks of treatment. Study 2 (124 patients randomized) tested 6 mg ABT-894 twice daily vs placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome measure in both studies was the weekly mean of the 24-hour average pain score recorded in each patient's diary. In both trials, none of the ABT-894 dose groups showed efficacy compared with placebo, whereas duloxetine achieved a statistically significant improvement over placebo in Study 1. All dose levels of ABT-894 were well tolerated, and no significant safety issues were identified. These results are in contrast to the outcome of a previously reported study of DPNP using the less selective α(4)β(2) NNR agonist ABT-594, which demonstrated efficacy compared with placebo, albeit with significant tolerability limitations. The failure of the highly selective α(4)β(2) NNR agonist ABT-894 indicates that it may not be possible to define a therapeutic index for this mechanism or that selectively targeting α(4)β(2) NNRs may not be a viable approach to treating neuropathic pain.
临床前和临床研究表明,神经元烟碱受体(NNR)激动剂可能是治疗多种疼痛疾病的一种新颖而有效的治疗方法。在 2 项单独的、随机、双盲、多中心、安慰剂对照的临床试验中,评估了高度选择性的α(4)β(2)NNR 激动剂 ABT-894 对糖尿病周围神经性疼痛(DPNP)患者的疗效和安全性。研究 1(280 例患者随机分组)比较了 ABT-894 1、2 和 4mg 每日 2 次与安慰剂以及每日 1 次 60mg 度洛西汀,治疗 8 周。研究 2(124 例患者随机分组)比较了 ABT-894 每日 2 次 6mg 与安慰剂治疗 8 周。这两项研究的主要疗效指标是每位患者日记中记录的 24 小时平均疼痛评分的每周平均值。在这两项试验中,与安慰剂相比,ABT-894 的任何剂量组均未显示疗效,而度洛西汀在研究 1 中与安慰剂相比有统计学意义的改善。ABT-894 的所有剂量水平均耐受良好,未发现明显的安全性问题。这些结果与之前使用较少选择性的α(4)β(2)NNR 激动剂 ABT-594 治疗 DPNP 的研究结果形成对比,该研究显示与安慰剂相比具有疗效,尽管存在显著的耐受性限制。高度选择性的α(4)β(2)NNR 激动剂 ABT-894 的失败表明,可能无法确定该机制的治疗指数,或者选择性靶向α(4)β(2)NNR 可能不是治疗神经性疼痛的可行方法。