Suppr超能文献

日本 7 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗接种计划的经济评价。

Economic evaluation of vaccination programme of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine to the birth cohort in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy and Management, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058577, Japan.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2012 May 9;30(22):3320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.033. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

Abstract

Aiming to introduce 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PVC-7) into routine vaccination schedule, the government of Japan gives a temporary budget to encourage municipalities in launching public vaccination programme which started on November 26, 2010 and ends on March 31, 2012. This study aims to appraise the 'value for money' of PCV-7 vaccination programme from the societal perspective and the budget impact from the perspective of municipalities, which is responsible for providing routine vaccination. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis with Markov modelling and calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) value of launching such programme with two levels of co-payment, ¥1000 (US$13) or ¥0, and two scenarios of the uptake of vaccine (vaccinated-alone or co-vaccinated with other vaccines). We found that when vaccinated-alone, ICERs in QALY were ¥7,441,000 (US$93,013) or ¥9,065,000 (US$113,313), and when co-vaccinated ¥7,441,000 (US$93,013) or ¥5,489,000 (US$68,613), without or with productivity loss, respectively, regardless of co-payment level of the programme. Co-vaccinated programmes had lower ICER than vaccinated-alone programmes due to the savings in productivity loss. By adopting WHO's classification that an intervention is 'cost-effective' if ICER (in QALY) is between 1 and 3 times of GDP as a criterion, PCV-7 vaccination programme in Japan is concluded as "cost-effective" from the perspective of society. The introduction of either no co-payment or ¥1000 (US$13) co-payment vaccination programme appears to be not budget saving for the first 6 years, whereas the level of budget impact are less than ¥11,000,000 (US$137,500) or ¥8,500,000 (US$106,250), respectively, for a municipality with 1000 birth cohort in the 1st year and 2nd to 5th year birth cohort proportional to the birth cohort population of estimated future population.

摘要

为将 7 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV-7)纳入常规免疫接种计划,日本政府提供临时预算,鼓励各地方政府启动公共疫苗接种计划。该计划于 2010 年 11 月 26 日开始,2012 年 3 月 31 日结束。本研究旨在从社会角度评估 PCV-7 疫苗接种计划的“性价比”,以及从负责提供常规疫苗接种的地方政府角度评估预算影响。我们采用马尔可夫模型进行成本效益分析,并计算了两种共付额水平(1000 日元[13 美元]或 0 日元)和两种疫苗接种方案(单独接种或与其他疫苗联合接种)下启动该计划的增量成本效益比(ICER)值。我们发现,在单独接种方案下,每 QALY 的 ICER 值为 744.1 万日元(93013 美元)或 9065 万日元(113313 美元),在联合接种方案下,无或有生产率损失时,ICER 值分别为 744.1 万日元(93013 美元)或 5489 万日元(68613 美元)。联合接种方案由于节省了生产率损失,其 ICER 低于单独接种方案。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的标准,如果干预措施的 ICER(每 QALY)在 1 到 3 倍 GDP 之间,则认为该干预措施具有“性价比”,从社会角度来看,日本的 PCV-7 疫苗接种计划被认为是“具有性价比”的。从最初 6 年来看,不收取或收取 1000 日元(13 美元)的共付额的接种方案都不会节省预算,而对于一个有 1000 个出生队列的城市来说,在第 1 年和第 2 年至第 5 年的出生队列中,预算影响的水平分别低于 1100 万日元(137500 美元)或 850 万日元(106250 美元),这与预计未来人口的出生队列人口成正比。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验