• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引入税收、补贴或两者结合:基于网络的超市随机试验中各种食品定价策略的效果。

Introducing taxes, subsidies or both: the effects of various food pricing strategies in a web-based supermarket randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2012 May;54(5):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.02.009
PMID:22387008
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Fiscal policies may form a solution in improving dietary intake. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of varying taxing and subsiding schemes to stimulate healthier food purchases.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial with three levels of price reduction on healthy foods (no; 25%; 50%)×three levels of price increase on unhealthy foods (5%; 10%; 25%) factorial design was used. 150 participants were randomized into one of nine conditions and were asked to purchase groceries at a web-based supermarket. Data were collected in the Netherlands in January-February 2010 and analyzed using analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Subjects receiving 50% discount purchased significantly more healthy foods than subjects receiving no (mean difference=6.62 items, p<0.01) or 25% discount (mean difference=4.87 items, p<0.05). Moreover, these subjects purchased more vegetables (mean difference=821 g;p<0.05 compared to no discount). However, participants with the highest discount also purchased significantly more calories. No significant effects of the price increases on unhealthy foods were found.

CONCLUSION

Price decreases are effective in stimulating healthy food purchases, but the proportion of healthy foods remains unaffected. Price increases up to 25% on unhealthier products do not significantly affect food purchases. Future studies are important to validate these results in real supermarkets and across different countries.

摘要

目的

财政政策可能是改善饮食摄入的一种解决方案。本研究旨在检验不同征税和补贴计划对促进更健康食品购买的有效性。

方法

采用健康食品降价幅度(无;25%;50%)×不健康食品涨价幅度(5%;10%;25%)三因子析因设计的随机对照试验。150 名参与者被随机分配到九种条件中的一种,并被要求在网上超市购买杂货。数据于 2010 年 1 月至 2 月在荷兰收集,并使用协方差分析进行分析。

结果

接受 50%折扣的受试者购买的健康食品明显多于接受无折扣(平均差异=6.62 件,p<0.01)或 25%折扣(平均差异=4.87 件,p<0.05)的受试者。此外,这些受试者购买的蔬菜也更多(平均差异=821 克;与无折扣相比,p<0.05)。然而,折扣最高的参与者也购买了明显更多的卡路里。未发现不健康食品价格上涨对食品购买有显著影响。

结论

降价可有效刺激健康食品购买,但健康食品的比例不受影响。对不太健康产品的价格上涨 25%不会显著影响食品购买。未来的研究对于在真实超市和不同国家验证这些结果很重要。

相似文献

1
Introducing taxes, subsidies or both: the effects of various food pricing strategies in a web-based supermarket randomized trial.引入税收、补贴或两者结合:基于网络的超市随机试验中各种食品定价策略的效果。
Prev Med. 2012 May;54(5):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
2
Effects of different discount levels on healthy products coupled with a healthy choice label, special offer label or both: results from a web-based supermarket experiment.不同折扣水平对附有健康选择标签、特价标签或两者兼有的健康产品的影响:基于网络的超市实验结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 May 16;10:59. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-59.
3
The effects of a 25% discount on fruits and vegetables: results of a randomized trial in a three-dimensional web-based supermarket.25%折扣对水果和蔬菜的影响:三维网络超市中随机试验的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Feb 8;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-11.
4
Healthy or Unhealthy on Sale? A cross-sectional study on the proportion of healthy and unhealthy foods promoted through flyer advertising by supermarkets in the Netherlands.促销的食品是健康还是不健康?一项关于荷兰超市通过传单广告促销的健康食品和不健康食品比例的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 6;15:470. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1748-8.
5
Effects of a price increase on purchases of sugar sweetened beverages. Results from a randomized controlled trial.价格上涨对含糖饮料购买量的影响。一项随机对照试验的结果。
Appetite. 2014 Jul;78:32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
6
Experimental analysis of the effect of taxes and subsides on calories purchased in an on-line supermarket.税收和补贴对在线超市购买卡路里影响的实验分析。
Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
7
Effects of price discounts and tailored nutrition education on supermarket purchases: a randomized controlled trial.价格折扣和定制营养教育对超市购买行为的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Mar;91(3):736-47. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28742. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
8
The effects of nudging and pricing on healthy food purchasing behavior in a virtual supermarket setting: a randomized experiment.在虚拟超市环境中,推动和定价对健康食品购买行为的影响:一项随机实验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Aug 3;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01005-7.
9
The influence of taxes and subsidies on energy purchased in an experimental purchasing study.税收和补贴对实验性购买研究中购买能源的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):406-14. doi: 10.1177/0956797610361446. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
10
Shifting toward a healthier dietary pattern through nudging and pricing strategies: A secondary analysis of a randomized virtual supermarket experiment.通过推动和定价策略转向更健康的饮食模式:一项随机虚拟超市实验的二次分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Aug 2;114(2):628-637. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab057.

引用本文的文献

1
Fiscal Incentives - Imperative for Promoting Healthy Eating.财政激励措施——促进健康饮食的必要条件。
Indian J Community Med. 2024 Nov-Dec;49(6):886-887. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_157_23. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
2
Poverty, price and preference barriers to improving diets in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区改善饮食所面临的贫困、价格和偏好障碍。
Glob Food Sec. 2023 Mar;36:100664. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100664.
3
A Commentary on the Healthy Community Stores Case Study Project: Implications for Retailers, Policy, and Future Research.
健康社区商店案例研究项目述评:对零售商、政策和未来研究的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 20;19(14):8824. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148824.
4
The healthy food marketing strategies study: design, baseline characteristics, and supermarket compliance.健康食品营销策略研究:设计、基线特征及超市合规情况
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Dec 31;10(6):1266-1276. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa078.
5
Can Healthy Checkout Counters Improve Food Purchases? Two Real-Life Experiments in Dutch Supermarkets.健康结账柜台能否改善食品购买行为?荷兰超市的两项真实实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 19;17(22):8611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228611.
6
A social cost-benefit analysis of meat taxation and a fruit and vegetables subsidy for a healthy and sustainable food consumption in the Netherlands.对荷兰肉类征税和水果及蔬菜补贴以促进健康和可持续食品消费的社会成本效益分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 11;20(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08590-z.
7
Determinants of weight loss maintenance: a systematic review.体重维持的决定因素:系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2019 Feb;20(2):171-211. doi: 10.1111/obr.12772. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
8
Impact of tax and subsidy framed messages on high- and lower-sugar beverages sold in vending machines: a randomized crossover trial.税收和补贴框架信息对自动售货机销售高糖和低糖饮料的影响:一项随机交叉试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Aug 13;15(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0711-3.
9
Grocery store interventions to change food purchasing behaviors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.杂货店干预措施改变食品购买行为:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jun 1;107(6):1004-1016. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy045.
10
A rapid review examining purchasing changes resulting from fiscal measures targeted at high sugar foods and sugar-sweetened drinks.一项快速审查考察了针对高糖食品和含糖饮料的财政措施所导致的采购变化。
Nutr Diabetes. 2017 Dec 15;7(12):302. doi: 10.1038/s41387-017-0001-1.