Suppr超能文献

在虚拟超市环境中,推动和定价对健康食品购买行为的影响:一项随机实验。

The effects of nudging and pricing on healthy food purchasing behavior in a virtual supermarket setting: a randomized experiment.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Upstream Team, www.upstreamteam.nl, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Aug 3;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01005-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence on what strategies - or combination of strategies - are most effective and equitable in promoting healthier diets is needed. This study examined the efficacy of nudging and pricing strategies on increasing healthy food purchases and the potential differential effect by socio-economic position (SEP) among Dutch adults in a virtual supermarket.

METHODS

A randomized study design was conducted within a virtual supermarket (SN VirtuMart). Participants were exposed to five within-subject study conditions (control, nudging, pricing, price salience and price salience with nudging) and randomized to one of three between-subject study arms (a 25% price increase on unhealthy products, a 25% discount on healthy products, or a 25% price increase and discount). In total, 455 participants of low and high SEP (using either education or income as proxy) were randomized to conduct their weekly shopping in a virtual supermarket for five consecutive weeks. The primary outcome included the percentage of healthy purchases. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

In total, 346 (76%) adults completed all five shops within the SN VirtuMart. Median age was 32.5, 49.2% had high education and 32.8% had high income. Out of the 12 conditions, four conditions were statistically significantly different from the control condition. Nudging and non-salient pricing strategies alone did not statistically significantly increase healthy food purchases, whereas a combination of salient price increases and discounts led to an increase in the percentage of healthy food purchases (B 4.5, 95%CI 2.6; 6.4). Combining salient pricing and nudging strategies led to increases in the percentage of healthy products in all three pricing arms, with largest effects found in the combined price increase and discount arm (B = 4.0, 95%CI = 2.0; 6.0). Effects were not modified by SEP.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining health-related price increases and discounts and combining these salient pricing strategies with nudges in a supermarket setting seems to stimulate healthy food purchases for both low and high SEP populations. However, further research in real-world settings is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This randomized trial ( NTR7293 ) was registered in the Dutch trial registry ( www.trialregister.nl ).

摘要

背景

需要有证据表明哪些策略——或策略组合——在促进更健康饮食方面最有效和公平。本研究在一个虚拟超市中,调查了荷兰成年人中推波助澜和定价策略对增加健康食品购买的效果,以及社会经济地位(SEP)的潜在差异影响。

方法

在一个虚拟超市(SN VirtuMart)中进行了一项随机研究设计。参与者接受了五种内主题研究条件(对照、推波助澜、定价、价格凸显和价格凸显与推波助澜),并随机分为三个外主题研究臂之一(不健康产品价格上涨 25%,健康产品价格折扣 25%,或不健康产品价格上涨和折扣 25%)。共有低和高 SEP(使用教育或收入作为代理)的 455 名参与者被随机分配在虚拟超市中进行连续五周的每周购物。主要结果包括健康购买的百分比。使用线性混合模型分析数据。

结果

共有 346 名(76%)成年人完成了 SN VirtuMart 中的所有五次购物。中位数年龄为 32.5 岁,49.2%具有高学历,32.8%收入较高。在 12 种情况下,有四种情况与对照条件有统计学显著差异。单独的推波助澜和非显著定价策略并没有使健康食品购买量有统计学显著增加,而显著的价格上涨和折扣相结合则导致健康食品购买量增加(B4.5,95%CI2.6;6.4)。在所有三种定价臂中,结合显著的定价和推波助澜策略都导致了健康产品的百分比增加,在结合价格上涨和折扣的臂中发现了最大的效果(B=4.0,95%CI2.0;6.0)。这些效果不受 SEP 的影响。

结论

在超市环境中,将与健康相关的价格上涨和折扣相结合,并将这些显著的定价策略与推波助澜相结合,似乎可以刺激低和高 SEP 人群购买健康食品。然而,还需要在现实世界环境中进行进一步的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7f/7398383/f641ef640380/12966_2020_1005_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验