Cruz Eduardo B, Moore Ann, Cross Vinette
School of Health Care, Setubal Polytechnic Institute, PT, Portugal.
Man Ther. 2012 Jun;17(3):246-50. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
Clinical reasoning has been described as a common process that underpins the myriad of tasks in the clinicians' practice. To date clinical reasoning models have emerged from research developed in specific and well-developed health care and professional cultures, such as those in Australia and the United States, but there has been little discussion of their relevance and applicability to other cultural settings. The aim of this investigation was to explore clinical reasoning processes in a sample of experienced Portuguese musculoskeletal physiotherapists. The study focused on clinicians' interaction with their patients in order to define and manage clinical problems. Data were collected through non-participant observation, semi-structured interviews, memos and field notes, and analysed thematically to explore and interpret clinical practice and reasoning. Findings highlighted that the clinicians were more likely to carry out their reasoning approach as a purely cognitive and clinician centred process. Perspectives of clinical reasoning therefore differ between cultures and contexts of practice and this has potential implications in the way physiotherapists interpret health and illness, their role as clinicians, as well as the patient-physiotherapist relationship.
临床推理被描述为一个支撑临床医生实践中无数任务的常见过程。迄今为止,临床推理模型源自于在特定且成熟的医疗保健和专业文化中开展的研究,比如澳大利亚和美国的研究,但对于这些模型在其他文化背景下的相关性和适用性,讨论甚少。本调查的目的是探究一组经验丰富的葡萄牙肌肉骨骼物理治疗师的临床推理过程。该研究聚焦于临床医生与患者的互动,以界定和处理临床问题。通过非参与式观察、半结构化访谈、备忘录和实地记录收集数据,并进行主题分析,以探索和解读临床实践与推理。研究结果突出表明,临床医生更倾向于将其推理方法作为一个纯粹以认知为导向且以临床医生为中心的过程。因此,临床推理的观点在不同文化和实践背景中存在差异,这对物理治疗师解释健康与疾病的方式、他们作为临床医生的角色以及医患关系都可能产生影响。