Carrier Annie, Levasseur Mélanie, Bédard Denis, Desrosiers Johanne
School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2012 Oct;59(5):355-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2012.01017.x. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Clinical reasoning, a critical skill influenced by education and practice context, determines how occupational therapists teach transfer skills. Teaching strategies affect intervention efficacy. Although knowledge about the way teaching strategies are chosen could help improve interventions, few studies have considered this aspect. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the clinical reasoning process of occupational therapists underlying the choice of strategies to teach older adults transfer skills.
A grounded theory study was carried out with eleven community occupational therapists recruited in six Health and Social Services Centres in Québec, Canada. Data were collected through observations of teaching situations (n = 31), in-depth semi-structured interviews (n = 12) and memos, and were analysed using constant comparative methods. Memos were also used to raise codes to conceptual categories, leading to an integrative framework. Rigour was assured by following scientific criteria for qualitative studies.
The integrative framework includes the clinical reasoning process, consisting of eight stages, and its factors of influence. These factors are internal (experiences and elements of personal context) and external (type of transfer, clients' and their environment's characteristics and practice context).
The clinical reasoning process underlying the choice of strategies to teach transfer skills was conceptualised into an integrative framework. Such a framework supports clinicians' reflective practice, highlights the importance of theory and practice of pedagogy in occupational therapists' education, and encourages consideration and better documentation of the possible influence of practice context on teaching interventions. As such, this integrative framework could improve occupational therapists' transfer skill interventions with older adults.
背景/目的:临床推理是一项受教育和实践环境影响的关键技能,它决定了职业治疗师如何教授转移技能。教学策略会影响干预效果。尽管了解教学策略的选择方式有助于改善干预措施,但很少有研究考虑这一方面。因此,本研究的目的是探讨职业治疗师在选择教授老年人转移技能的策略时的临床推理过程。
对在加拿大魁北克省六个健康与社会服务中心招募的11名社区职业治疗师进行了扎根理论研究。通过观察教学情境(n = 31)、深入的半结构化访谈(n = 12)和备忘录收集数据,并使用持续比较法进行分析。备忘录还用于将代码提升为概念类别,从而形成一个综合框架。通过遵循定性研究的科学标准确保严谨性。
综合框架包括由八个阶段组成的临床推理过程及其影响因素。这些因素包括内部因素(个人背景的经验和要素)和外部因素(转移类型、客户及其环境的特征以及实践环境)。
教授转移技能的策略选择背后的临床推理过程被概念化为一个综合框架。这样的框架支持临床医生的反思性实践,突出了教学理论与实践在职业治疗师教育中的重要性,并鼓励考虑实践环境对教学干预可能产生的影响并进行更好的记录。因此,这个综合框架可以改善职业治疗师对老年人的转移技能干预。