Shanghai Key Laboratory of Functional Materials Chemistry, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, PR China.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012 Mar;4(3):1822-30. doi: 10.1021/am3001049. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
Two organic D-A-π-A sensitizers LS-2 and WS-5 containing N-octyl substituted phthalimide and benzotriazole as auxiliary electron withdrawing units with similar dimension and structure architecture were systematically studied, focusing on photophysical and electrochemical as well as photovoltaic properties in nanocrystalline TiO(2)-based dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Interestingly, with similar five-member benzo-heterocycles, the two auxiliary acceptors of phthalimide and benzotriazole play exactly different roles in absorption and intramolecular charge transfer: (i) in contrast with WS-5 delocalized throughout the entire chromophore, the HOMO orbital of LS-2 is mainly located at the donor part due to the twist conformation with the existence of two carbonyl groups in phthalimide; (ii) the dihedral angles of "D-A" plane and "A-π" plane in LS-2 further suggest that the incorporation of phthalimide moiety results in curvature of electron delocalization over the whole molecule, in agreement with its blue-shifted, relatively narrow absorption spectra and low photocurrent density; (iii) in contrast with the beneficial charge transfer of benzotriazole in WS-5, the phthalimide unit in LS-2 plays an oppositely negative contribution to the charge transfer, that is, blocking intramolecular electron transfer (ICT) from donor to acceptor to some extent; and (iv) in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, the incorporated benzotriazole unit enhances electron lifetime by 18.6-fold, the phthalimide only increases electron lifetime by 5.0-fold. Without coadsorption of chenodeoxylic acid (CDCA), the DSSCs based on WS-5 exhibited a promising maximum conversion efficiency (η) of 8.38% with significant enhancement in all photovoltaic parameters (J(SC) = 15.79 mA cm(-2), V(OC) = 791 mV, ff = 0.67). In contrast, with the very similar D-A-π-A feature changing the additional acceptor from benzotriazole to phthalimide unit, the photovoltaic efficiency based on LS-2 was only 5.11%, decreased by 39%, with less efficient photovoltaic parameters (J(SC) = 10.06 mA cm(-2), V(OC) = 748 mV, ff = 0.68). Therefore, our results demonstrate that it is essential to choose proper subsidiary withdrawing unit in D-A-π-A sensitizer configuration for DSSCs.
我们系统地研究了两种有机 D-A-π-A 敏化剂 LS-2 和 WS-5,它们都含有作为辅助电子受主单元的 N-辛基取代的邻苯二甲酰亚胺和苯并三唑,具有相似的尺寸和结构架构,重点研究了在纳米晶 TiO(2) 基染料敏化太阳能电池 (DSSC) 中的光物理和电化学以及光伏性能。有趣的是,尽管具有相似的五元苯并杂环,但邻苯二甲酰亚胺和苯并三唑这两个辅助受体在吸收和分子内电荷转移方面发挥着完全不同的作用:(i) 与 WS-5 在整个发色团中扩散相比,LS-2 的 HOMO 轨道主要位于供体部分,因为在邻苯二甲酰亚胺中存在两个羰基,导致构象扭曲;(ii) LS-2 中“D-A”平面和“A-π”平面的二面角进一步表明,引入邻苯二甲酰亚胺部分导致电子离域在整个分子上弯曲,这与它的蓝移、相对较窄的吸收光谱和低光电流密度一致;(iii) 与 WS-5 中苯并三唑有利于电荷转移相反,LS-2 中的邻苯二甲酰亚胺单元对电荷转移有相反的负贡献,即在某种程度上阻止了从供体到受体的分子内电子转移 (ICT);(iv) 在电化学阻抗谱中,苯并三唑单元将电子寿命提高了 18.6 倍,而邻苯二甲酰亚胺仅将电子寿命提高了 5.0 倍。在没有 chenodeoxylic acid (CDCA) 共吸附的情况下,基于 WS-5 的 DSSC 表现出高达 8.38%的最大转换效率(η),所有光伏参数(J(SC) = 15.79 mA cm(-2),V(OC) = 791 mV,ff = 0.67)都有显著提高。相比之下,尽管具有非常相似的 D-A-π-A 特征,将附加受体从苯并三唑改为邻苯二甲酰亚胺单元,但基于 LS-2 的光伏效率仅为 5.11%,下降了 39%,光伏参数效率较低(J(SC) = 10.06 mA cm(-2),V(OC) = 748 mV,ff = 0.68)。因此,我们的结果表明,对于 DSSC,在 D-A-π-A 敏化剂结构中选择合适的辅助吸电子单元是至关重要的。