• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[语义丰富度对情绪词汇视觉识别的影响]

[The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].

作者信息

Syssau Arielle, Laxén Jannika

机构信息

Laboratoire Epsylon, Universites Montpellier.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Mar;66(1):70-8. doi: 10.1037/a0027083.

DOI:10.1037/a0027083
PMID:22390477
Abstract

The aim of this study was to expand our knowledge of the influence of emotional valence on visual word recognition by answering two questions. The first was to examine whether the emotional valence effect is sensitive to different types of task requirements, and the second was to examine whether words polysemy can modulate the effect of emotional valence. For this purpose, we manipulated orthogonally emotional valence (negative, positive and neutral words) and polysemy (polysemous vs. non polysemous words) in two versions of the lexical-decision task (one with legal nonwords and one with illegal nonwords). Results showed an effect of task: emotional valence and polysemy influenced lexical decision latencies only in the legal version of the lexical-decision task. Furthermore, results showed that the effect of polysemy was dependant on emotional valence. We observed a facilitation of polysemy for neutral words but not for emotional ones. Finally this experiment also showed that polysemy modulates the emotional valence effect. The facilitation observed for non polysemous emotional words compared to non polysemous neutral words disappeared for polysemous words. These findings fit with other studies showing facilitation for emotional word recognition and allow conclusions concerning the role of semantics on emotional word recognition.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过回答两个问题来扩展我们对情绪效价对视觉单词识别影响的认识。第一个问题是检验情绪效价效应是否对不同类型的任务要求敏感,第二个问题是检验单词的多义性是否能调节情绪效价的影响。为此,我们在两种版本的词汇判断任务(一种使用合法非词,另一种使用非法非词)中,对情绪效价(消极、积极和中性词)和多义性(多义词与非多义词)进行了正交操纵。结果显示了任务效应:情绪效价和多义性仅在词汇判断任务的合法版本中影响词汇判断潜伏期。此外,结果表明多义性的影响取决于情绪效价。我们观察到中性词存在多义性促进作用,而情绪词则没有。最后,该实验还表明多义性调节了情绪效价效应。与非多义中性词相比,非多义情绪词所观察到的促进作用在多义词中消失了。这些发现与其他显示情绪词识别存在促进作用的研究相符,并有助于得出关于语义在情绪词识别中作用的结论。

相似文献

1
[The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].[语义丰富度对情绪词汇视觉识别的影响]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Mar;66(1):70-8. doi: 10.1037/a0027083.
2
Not all ambiguous words are created equal: an EEG investigation of homonymy and polysemy.并非所有歧义词汇都具有相同性质:同音异义词和多义词的 EEG 研究。
Brain Lang. 2012 Oct;123(1):11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
3
Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: an fMRI study.单字加工中情绪效价的附带效应:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):1022-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.050. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
4
Neural evidence of effects of emotional valence on word recognition.情绪效价对单词识别影响的神经证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2005 Sep;57(3):165-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.01.002. Epub 2005 Mar 19.
5
An ERP study of category priming: evidence of early lexical semantic access.一项关于范畴启动效应的事件相关电位研究:早期词汇语义通达的证据。
Biol Psychol. 2009 Jan;80(1):122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.009. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
6
The graded effect of valence on word recognition in Spanish.西班牙语中效价对单词识别的分级效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 May;45(5):851-868. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000616. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
7
Effects of valence and arousal on emotional word processing are modulated by concreteness: Behavioral and ERP evidence from a lexical decision task.效价和唤醒对情绪词汇加工的影响受具体性调节:来自词汇判断任务的行为和事件相关电位证据
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Dec;110:231-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.07.499. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
8
Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence.词汇判断任务中的瞳孔反应随单词频率而变化,但不随情感效价而变化。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Aug;65(2):132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
9
Are effects of emotion in single words non-lexical? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.情绪在单个单词中的作用是非词汇性的吗?来自事件相关脑电位的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
10
Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: an ERP study.近期词汇暴露对情绪词 Stroop 干扰的影响:一项 ERP 研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Mar;79(3):356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.12.003. Epub 2010 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
FANCat: French affective norms for ten emotional categories.FANCat:十种情绪类别情感的法国情感规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb;53(1):447-465. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01450-z.
2
The influence of emotion on lexical processing: insights from RT distributional analysis.情绪对词汇加工的影响:来自反应时分布分析的见解。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):526-33. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0525-x.