Suppr超能文献

“学校里的双胞胎”。一项全澳大利亚范围的项目。

"Twins in school". An Australia-wide program.

作者信息

Gleeson C, Hay D A, Johnston C J, Theobald T M

机构信息

Australian Multiple Birth Association (AMBA), Coogee, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1990;39(2):231-44. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000005468.

Abstract

The multiple birth family is more likely to have a dispute with the education system than with any other service. So many potential areas of conflict exist over the abilities and behaviour of multiples and over such issues as separation or keeping back one twin. One reason for disputes is the lack of good data to adequately reflect the different perspectives of parents and teachers and the differing needs of families: the same solution does not apply to all. To provide the first large-scale data base and building upon an initial survey of 85% of all primary school teachers in South Australia, the LaTrobe Twin Study and AMBA worked with Education Departments to set-up in each state Education Research Teams (ERTs) of parents of multiples who were also teachers. The ERTs were crucial in three phases. 1) Developing and circulating questionnaires and publicising the nationwide survey. 784 families and 1264 teachers of their children completed these questionnaires, many reporting that simply having to address the issues raised in the questionnaire was a valuable learning experience. 2) Exploring the data base. Issues arising included the very different bases on which parents and teachers judged separation desirable, with teachers emphasising the unsubstantiated claim that separation is essential to individual development. Separation became more common over the first three years of schooling but 20-25% of twins separated one year were back together the next. 3) Running regional meetings of parents, teachers and administrators to discuss the results and to pool experiences and plan policies at the local level. A need clearly exists to improve the level of consultation between families and school personnel and to ensure the widespread availability of information which identifies key issues in making decisions for that multiple birth family.

摘要

多胞胎家庭与教育系统发生纠纷的可能性比与任何其他服务机构都要大。在多胞胎的能力和行为以及诸如分开或让其中一个双胞胎留级等问题上,存在着许多潜在的冲突领域。纠纷产生的一个原因是缺乏良好的数据来充分反映家长和教师的不同观点以及家庭的不同需求:同样的解决方案并不适用于所有情况。为了提供第一个大规模数据库,并基于对南澳大利亚州85%的小学教师进行的初步调查,拉筹伯双胞胎研究和澳大利亚多胞胎协会(AMBA)与各教育部门合作,在每个州设立了由也是教师的多胞胎家长组成的教育研究小组(ERTs)。ERTs在三个阶段发挥了关键作用。1) 制定并分发问卷,并宣传全国性调查。784个家庭及其孩子的1264名教师完成了这些问卷,许多人报告说,仅仅是回答问卷中提出的问题就是一次宝贵的学习经历。2) 探索数据库。出现的问题包括家长和教师判断分开是否可取的依据截然不同,教师强调了未经证实的说法,即分开对个人发展至关重要。在上学的头三年里,分开的情况变得更加普遍,但有20%-25%在一年级分开的双胞胎在次年又重新在一起了。3) 召开家长、教师和管理人员的区域会议,讨论结果,汇集经验,并在地方层面制定政策。显然有必要提高家庭和学校工作人员之间的协商水平,并确保广泛提供能够确定多胞胎家庭决策关键问题的信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验