Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;107(6):878-84. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.40. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
Colonoscopy is the gold standard for visualization of the colon. It is generally accepted as a safe procedure and major adverse events occur at a low rate. However, few data are available on structured assessment of (minor) post-procedural adverse events.
Consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were asked for permission to be called 30 days after their procedure. A standard telephone interview was developed to assess the occurrence of (i) major adverse events (hospital visit required), (ii) minor adverse events, and (iii) days missed from work. Adverse events were further categorized in definite-, possible-, and unrelated adverse events. Patients were contacted between January 2010 and September 2010.
Out of a total of 1,528 patients who underwent colonoscopy and gave permission for a telephone call, 1,144 patients were contacted (response: 75%), 49% were male, the mean age was 59 years (s.d.: 14). Thirty-four patients (3%) reported major adverse events. These were definite-related in nine (1%) patients, possible-related in 6 (1%), and unrelated in 19 patients (2%). Minor adverse events were reported by 466 patients (41%). These were definite-related in 336 patients (29%), possible-related in 36 (3%), and unrelated in the remaining 94 patients (8%). Female gender (odds ratio (OR): 1.5), age <50 years (OR: 1.5), colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening/surveillance (OR: 1.6), and fellow-endoscopy (OR: 1.7) were risk factors for the occurrence of any definite-related adverse event. Patients who reported definite-related adverse events were significantly less often willing to return for colonoscopy (81 vs. 88%, P<0.01) and were less often positive about the entire colonoscopy experience (84 vs. 89%, P=0.04).
Structured assessment of post-colonoscopy adverse events shows that these are more common than generally reported. Close to one-third of patients report definite-related adverse events, which are major in close to 1 in 100 patients. The occurrence of adverse events does have an impact on the willingness to return for colonoscopy.
结肠镜检查是观察结肠的金标准。它通常被认为是一种安全的程序,主要不良事件的发生率很低。然而,关于(轻微)术后不良事件的结构化评估的数据很少。
连续接受结肠镜检查的门诊患者在检查后 30 天被要求允许打电话。开发了一种标准的电话访谈,以评估(i)主要不良事件(需要就诊)、(ii)轻微不良事件和(iii)缺勤天数的发生情况。不良事件进一步分为明确相关、可能相关和不相关不良事件。患者于 2010 年 1 月至 2010 年 9 月期间接受了联系。
在总共接受结肠镜检查并允许打电话的 1528 名患者中,有 1144 名患者(回应率:75%)接受了联系,其中 49%为男性,平均年龄为 59 岁(标准差:14)。34 名患者(3%)报告了主要不良事件。其中 9 例(1%)为明确相关,6 例(1%)为可能相关,19 例(2%)为不相关。466 名患者(41%)报告了轻微不良事件。其中 336 例(29%)为明确相关,36 例(3%)为可能相关,其余 94 例(8%)为不相关。女性(比值比(OR):1.5)、年龄<50 岁(OR:1.5)、结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查/监测(OR:1.6)和内镜同行(OR:1.7)是任何明确相关不良事件发生的危险因素。报告明确相关不良事件的患者明显不太愿意再次接受结肠镜检查(81%比 88%,P<0.01),对整个结肠镜检查体验也不太满意(84%比 89%,P=0.04)。
对结肠镜检查后不良事件的结构化评估表明,这些不良事件比通常报告的更为常见。近三分之一的患者报告了明确相关的不良事件,其中近 1/100 的患者出现了主要不良事件。不良事件的发生确实会影响患者再次接受结肠镜检查的意愿。