Abd-Elsayed Alaa A, Seif John, Guirguis Maged, Zaky Sherif, Mounir-Soliman Loran
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
J Clin Med Res. 2011 Dec;3(6):325-7. doi: 10.4021/jocmr645w. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
Peripheral nerve catheter placement is used to control surgical pain. Performing bilateral brachial plexus block with catheters is not frequently performed; and in our case sending patient home with bilateral brachial plexus catheters has not been reported up to our knowledge. Our patient is a 57 years old male patient presented with bilateral upper extremity digital gangrene on digits 2 through 4 on both sides with no thumb involvement. The plan was to do the surgery under sequential axillary blocks. On the day of surgery a right axillary brachial plexus block was performed under ultrasound guidance using 20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine. Patient was taken to the OR and the right fingers amputation was carried out under mild sedation without problems. Left axillary brachial plexus block was then done as the surgeon was closing the right side, two hours after the first block was performed. The left axillary block was done also under ultrasound using 20 ml of 2% mepivacaine. The brachial plexus blocks were performed in a sequential manner. Surgery was unremarkable, and patient was transferred to post anesthetic care unit in stable condition. Over that first postoperative night, the patient complained of severe pain at the surgical sites with minimal pain relief with parentral opioids. We placed bilateral brachial plexus catheters (right axillary and left infra-clavicular brachial plexus catheters). Ropivacaine 0.2% infusion was started at 7 ml per hour basal rate only with no boluses on each side. The patient was discharged home with the catheters in place after receiving the appropriate education. On discharge both catheters were connected to a single ON-Q (I-flow Corporation, Lake Forest, CA) ball pump with a 750 ml reservoir using a Y connection and were set to deliver a fixed rate of 7 ml for each catheter. The brachial plexus catheters were removed by the patient on day 5 after surgery without any difficulty. Patient's postoperative course was otherwise unremarkable. We concluded that home going catheters are very effective in pain control postoperatively and they shorten the period of hospital stay.
Brachial plexus; Home going catheters; Post-operative pain.
外周神经导管置入用于控制手术疼痛。双侧臂丛神经导管阻滞并不常用;就我们所知,此前尚未有让患者带着双侧臂丛神经导管回家的报道。我们的患者是一名57岁男性,双侧上肢第2至4指出现干性坏疽,拇指未受累。计划在连续腋路阻滞下进行手术。手术当天,在超声引导下使用20毫升0.75%罗哌卡因进行了右侧腋路臂丛神经阻滞。患者被送入手术室,在轻度镇静下进行了右手手指截肢,过程顺利。在第一次阻滞实施两小时后,当外科医生缝合右侧伤口时,进行了左侧腋路臂丛神经阻滞。左侧腋路阻滞同样在超声引导下进行,使用了20毫升2%甲哌卡因。臂丛神经阻滞按顺序进行。手术过程顺利,患者被平稳地转至麻醉后护理单元。在术后的第一个晚上,患者主诉手术部位剧痛,静脉注射阿片类药物后疼痛缓解甚微。我们置入了双侧臂丛神经导管(右侧腋路和左侧锁骨下臂丛神经导管)。仅以每小时7毫升的基础速率开始输注0.2%罗哌卡因,两侧均未推注。在接受适当教育后,患者带着导管出院。出院时,两根导管通过Y形连接与一个带有750毫升储液器的单台ON-Q(I-flow公司,加利福尼亚州莱克福里斯特)球泵相连,并设置为每根导管固定输注速率7毫升。患者在术后第5天顺利拔除了臂丛神经导管。患者术后恢复过程无其他异常。我们得出结论,带回家的导管在术后疼痛控制方面非常有效,并且缩短了住院时间。
臂丛神经;带回家的导管;术后疼痛