Eskin Mehmet Burak, Ceylan Ayşegül
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, Ankara -Turkey.
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Turkey.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 Jul;26(4):620-627. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.03302.
The configuration of a nerve block catheter may affect the local anesthetic spread in epidural analgesia and continuous peripheral nerve blocks. This prospective and randomized study aims to compare the multi-orifice nerve block catheter with an end-hole catheter in ultrasound-guided continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) in terms of providing postoperative analgesia for the orthopedic upper limb surgery below the shoulder. The primary outcome measure was mean pain scores. Secondary outcome measures were the consumption of rescue analgesic and the amount of local anesthetics delivered by a Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) device.
A total of 58 adult patients who underwent orthopedic upper limb surgery below the shoulder were randomly assigned into two groups: group end-hole catheter (EHC) (n=31) and group multi-orifice catheter (MOC) (n=27). All patients received a single-shot infraclavicular BPB using 100 mg lidocaine 2% and 75 mg bupivacaine 0.5% administrated through a Tuohy needle. Then, a multi-orifice (triple-hole) nerve catheter was placed in the group MOC and an end-hole (one-hole) catheter in the group EHC at the same location. Bupivacaine 0.125% was infused through the catheters via PCA (infusion rate: 2 mlh-1, automated regular bolus: 5 mlh-1, patient-controlled bolus: 3 ml, lock-out time: 1 hour, 4 hours limit: 40 ml). Pain intensity was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Mean VAS scores were higher in group EHC than group MOC in the first postoperative day (p=0.001). Mean rescue analgesic consumption, the number of bolus demand on PCA, PCA bolus demand dose, and total PCA dose were higher in group EHC than group MOC during the first postoperative day (p<0.05).
It is concluded that the use of MHC is more effective than EHC for continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in providing postoperative pain relief during the first 24 hours.
神经阻滞导管的配置可能会影响硬膜外镇痛和连续周围神经阻滞中局部麻醉药的扩散。这项前瞻性随机研究旨在比较多孔神经阻滞导管和端孔导管在超声引导下连续锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞(BPB)中为肩部以下骨科上肢手术提供术后镇痛的效果。主要结局指标是平均疼痛评分。次要结局指标是补救性镇痛药的消耗量和患者自控镇痛(PCA)装置输送的局部麻醉药量。
共有58例接受肩部以下骨科上肢手术的成年患者被随机分为两组:端孔导管组(EHC)(n = 31)和多孔导管组(MOC)(n = 27)。所有患者均使用100 mg 2%利多卡因和75 mg 0.5%布比卡因通过Tuohy针进行单次锁骨下BPB。然后,在MOC组同一位置放置一根多孔(三孔)神经导管,在EHC组放置一根端孔(单孔)导管。通过PCA以0.125%布比卡因经导管输注(输注速率:2 ml/h,自动定时推注:5 ml/h,患者自控推注:3 ml,锁定时间:1小时,4小时限量:40 ml)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度。
术后第一天,EHC组的平均VAS评分高于MOC组(p = 0.001)。术后第一天,EHC组的平均补救性镇痛药消耗量、PCA推注需求次数、PCA推注需求剂量和PCA总剂量均高于MOC组(p < 0.05)。
得出结论,在连续锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞中,使用多孔导管在术后24小时内提供疼痛缓解比端孔导管更有效。