Department of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg, Germany.
Blood. 2012 May 3;119(18):4101-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-312421. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
Standardized criteria for diagnosis and response evaluation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are essential to achieve comparability of results and improvement of clinical care. With the increasing range of therapeutic options, the treatment context is important when defining refractory CLL. Refractory CLL has been defined as no response or response lasting ≤ 6 months from last therapy. This subgroup has a very poor outcome, and many trials use this group as an entry point for early drug development. With the intensification of first-line regimens, the proportion of patients with refractory CLL using these criteria decreases. This has immediate consequences for recruitment of patients into trials as well as salvage strategies. Conversely, patients who are not refractory according to the traditional definition but who have suboptimal or short response to intense therapy also have a very poor outcome. In this Perspective, we discuss recent results that may lead to a reassessment of risk categories in CLL focusing on fit patients who are eligible for all treatment options. We cover aspects of the history and biologic basis for refractory CLL and will focus on how emerging data on treatment failure from large trials using chemoimmunotherapy may help to define risk groups in CLL.
慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的诊断和疗效评估标准对于实现结果的可比性和改善临床护理至关重要。随着治疗选择范围的不断扩大,在定义难治性 CLL 时,治疗背景很重要。难治性 CLL 定义为上次治疗后无反应或反应持续时间≤6 个月。该亚组的预后非常差,许多试验将该组作为早期药物开发的切入点。随着一线方案的强化,使用这些标准的难治性 CLL 患者比例下降。这对试验招募和挽救策略都有直接影响。相反,根据传统定义没有达到难治性但对强化治疗反应不佳或反应时间短的患者也有非常差的预后。在本观点中,我们将讨论可能导致重新评估 CLL 风险类别的最新结果,重点关注适合所有治疗选择的合适患者。我们将涵盖难治性 CLL 的历史和生物学基础的各个方面,并将重点介绍使用化疗免疫疗法的大型试验中关于治疗失败的新数据如何帮助定义 CLL 的风险组。