Suppr超能文献

两种胃泌素释放肽前体免疫测定法的特性及临床有效性

Characteristics and clinical validity of two immunoassays for ProGRP.

作者信息

Nordlund Marianne S, Stieber Petra, Brustugun Odd Terje, Warren David J, Paus Elisabeth

机构信息

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Tumour Biol. 2012 Aug;33(4):1105-13. doi: 10.1007/s13277-012-0351-1. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

Abstract

Progastrin-releasing peptide (proGRP) is a promising serum tumor marker for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We have tested assay specificity and performed a correlation study between a recently developed time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (TR-IFMA) for proGRP and the established Advanced Life Science Institute (ALSI) ELISA method. Between-method correlation and comparison of clinical performance were studied in 481 individuals, among them, 178 lung cancers, 84 benign diseases of the lung, and 219 healthy controls. Follow-up time >6 years was observed for 89 patients with SCLC. The two assays had quite different epitope specificities where the TR-IFMA recognized a considerable smaller proGRP fragment than the ALSI ELISA. However, the correlation between the two methods for elevated proGRP values (>85 ng/l) was good (ρ = 0.948). Both assays displayed good discrimination between benign lung diseases and SCLC. The cut-off values for positive classification of SCLC versus non-small cell lung cancers and benign lung diseases at >95% specificity were 85 ng/l for the TR-IFMA and 42 ng/l for the ALSI ELISA. Both proGRP assays showed good clinical validity. However, due to differences in the recommended cut-off values, switching methods is not recommended. There was a significant difference in survival of patients with TR-IFMA proGRP values over the cut-off (85 ng/l) compared with patients with values under the cut-off, p = 0.0002. In contrast, the ALSI ELISA assay failed to provide statistically significant prognostic information, p = 0.066.

摘要

胃泌素释放肽前体(proGRP)是一种很有前景的小细胞肺癌(SCLC)血清肿瘤标志物。我们测试了检测方法的特异性,并对最近开发的用于检测proGRP的时间分辨免疫荧光分析法(TR-IFMA)与已确立的先进生命科学研究所(ALSI)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法进行了相关性研究。在481名个体中研究了两种方法之间的相关性以及临床性能的比较,其中包括178例肺癌、84例肺部良性疾病患者和219名健康对照者。对89例SCLC患者进行了>6年的随访。两种检测方法具有相当不同的表位特异性,其中TR-IFMA识别的proGRP片段比ALSI ELISA识别的片段小得多。然而,两种方法对于升高的proGRP值(>85 ng/l)之间的相关性良好(ρ = 0.948)。两种检测方法在肺部良性疾病和SCLC之间均表现出良好的区分能力。对于SCLC与非小细胞肺癌及肺部良性疾病进行阳性分类时,特异性>95%的临界值,TR-IFMA为85 ng/l,ALSI ELISA为42 ng/l。两种proGRP检测方法均显示出良好的临床有效性。然而,由于推荐的临界值存在差异,不建议更换检测方法。与proGRP值低于临界值(85 ng/l)的患者相比,TR-IFMA检测的proGRP值高于临界值的患者生存率存在显著差异,p = 0.0002。相比之下,ALSI ELISA检测未能提供具有统计学意义的预后信息,p = 0.066。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验