Nordlund Marianne S, Stieber Petra, Brustugun Odd Terje, Warren David J, Paus Elisabeth
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Tumour Biol. 2012 Aug;33(4):1105-13. doi: 10.1007/s13277-012-0351-1. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
Progastrin-releasing peptide (proGRP) is a promising serum tumor marker for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We have tested assay specificity and performed a correlation study between a recently developed time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (TR-IFMA) for proGRP and the established Advanced Life Science Institute (ALSI) ELISA method. Between-method correlation and comparison of clinical performance were studied in 481 individuals, among them, 178 lung cancers, 84 benign diseases of the lung, and 219 healthy controls. Follow-up time >6 years was observed for 89 patients with SCLC. The two assays had quite different epitope specificities where the TR-IFMA recognized a considerable smaller proGRP fragment than the ALSI ELISA. However, the correlation between the two methods for elevated proGRP values (>85 ng/l) was good (ρ = 0.948). Both assays displayed good discrimination between benign lung diseases and SCLC. The cut-off values for positive classification of SCLC versus non-small cell lung cancers and benign lung diseases at >95% specificity were 85 ng/l for the TR-IFMA and 42 ng/l for the ALSI ELISA. Both proGRP assays showed good clinical validity. However, due to differences in the recommended cut-off values, switching methods is not recommended. There was a significant difference in survival of patients with TR-IFMA proGRP values over the cut-off (85 ng/l) compared with patients with values under the cut-off, p = 0.0002. In contrast, the ALSI ELISA assay failed to provide statistically significant prognostic information, p = 0.066.
胃泌素释放肽前体(proGRP)是一种很有前景的小细胞肺癌(SCLC)血清肿瘤标志物。我们测试了检测方法的特异性,并对最近开发的用于检测proGRP的时间分辨免疫荧光分析法(TR-IFMA)与已确立的先进生命科学研究所(ALSI)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法进行了相关性研究。在481名个体中研究了两种方法之间的相关性以及临床性能的比较,其中包括178例肺癌、84例肺部良性疾病患者和219名健康对照者。对89例SCLC患者进行了>6年的随访。两种检测方法具有相当不同的表位特异性,其中TR-IFMA识别的proGRP片段比ALSI ELISA识别的片段小得多。然而,两种方法对于升高的proGRP值(>85 ng/l)之间的相关性良好(ρ = 0.948)。两种检测方法在肺部良性疾病和SCLC之间均表现出良好的区分能力。对于SCLC与非小细胞肺癌及肺部良性疾病进行阳性分类时,特异性>95%的临界值,TR-IFMA为85 ng/l,ALSI ELISA为42 ng/l。两种proGRP检测方法均显示出良好的临床有效性。然而,由于推荐的临界值存在差异,不建议更换检测方法。与proGRP值低于临界值(85 ng/l)的患者相比,TR-IFMA检测的proGRP值高于临界值的患者生存率存在显著差异,p = 0.0002。相比之下,ALSI ELISA检测未能提供具有统计学意义的预后信息,p = 0.066。