• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学思维与实践行为:弥合青少年体重管理干预措施中的差距。

How science thinks and practice acts: bridging the gap in weight management interventions for adolescents.

机构信息

Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2012 Apr;29 Suppl 1:i117-i125. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr086.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmr086
PMID:22399540
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adolescent obesity calls for evidence-based treatment approaches given its long-term physical and psychosocial consequences. However, research shows there are many problems in the translation of scientific evidence into practice.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop science- and practice-based recommendations for the planning of future adolescent weight management interventions.

METHODS

We performed (i) literature reviews on intervention studies targeting treatment of obesity in adolescents and Dutch clinical guidelines for obesity as well as practice-based documents and grey literature on treating obesity and delivering health programs for adolescents and (ii) semi-structured interviews with eight clinicians and four non-clinicians working in obesity treatment, management and prevention to explore perspectives on treating adolescent obesity and using evidence in practice.

RESULTS

After merging the results from the literature reviews and interviews, four issues emerged: (i) little reporting on theoretical models used in intervention studies, Dutch clinical guidelines and semi-structured interviews; (ii) inconsistency on age-specific considerations for treating obesity in adolescents in intervention studies and Dutch clinical guidelines; (iii) inconsistency on addressing the social nature of obesity in intervention studies and Dutch clinical guidelines and (iv) how professional responsibility should be divided is unclear from intervention studies, Dutch clinical guidelines and semi-structured interviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Joined action of science and practice is required for future interventions. Future interventions should include topics relevant to the stage of adolescence and give greater focus to the complex social nature of obesity. Lastly, practitioners can generate more practice-based evidence by starting their own practice-based research.

摘要

背景

青少年肥胖需要基于证据的治疗方法,因为它会带来长期的身体和心理社会后果。然而,研究表明,将科学证据转化为实践存在许多问题。

目的

本研究旨在为未来青少年体重管理干预计划制定基于科学和实践的建议。

方法

我们进行了(i)针对青少年肥胖治疗的干预研究、荷兰肥胖临床指南以及针对肥胖治疗和为青少年提供健康计划的实践文件和灰色文献的文献综述,以及(ii)对 8 名临床医生和 4 名从事肥胖治疗、管理和预防工作的非临床医生进行半结构化访谈,以探讨治疗青少年肥胖和在实践中使用证据的观点。

结果

将文献综述和访谈的结果合并后,出现了四个问题:(i)干预研究、荷兰临床指南和半结构化访谈中很少报告使用的理论模型;(ii)干预研究和荷兰临床指南中针对青少年肥胖治疗的年龄特定考虑因素不一致;(iii)干预研究和荷兰临床指南中在解决肥胖的社会性质方面不一致;(iv)从干预研究、荷兰临床指南和半结构化访谈中不清楚专业责任应如何划分。

结论

未来的干预措施需要科学和实践的共同行动。未来的干预措施应包括与青春期阶段相关的主题,并更加关注肥胖的复杂社会性质。最后,从业者可以通过开展自己的基于实践的研究来生成更多基于实践的证据。

相似文献

1
How science thinks and practice acts: bridging the gap in weight management interventions for adolescents.科学思维与实践行为:弥合青少年体重管理干预措施中的差距。
Fam Pract. 2012 Apr;29 Suppl 1:i117-i125. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr086.
2
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.降低儿童和青少年肥胖及相关慢性病风险:证据综合与“最佳实践”建议
Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x.
3
Effective weight management practice: a review of the lifestyle intervention evidence.有效体重管理实践:生活方式干预证据综述。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Feb;36(2):178-85. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.80. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
4
Practitioner review: bridging the gap between research and clinical practice in pediatric obesity.从业者综述:弥合儿科肥胖研究与临床实践之间的差距
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;48(2):115-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01613.x.
5
Motivational interviewing for pediatric obesity: Conceptual issues and evidence review.儿童肥胖的动机性访谈:概念问题与证据综述
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Dec;106(12):2024-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.09.015.
6
History matters: childhood weight trajectories as a basis for planning community-based obesity prevention to adolescents.历史很重要:儿童体重轨迹为基于社区的青少年肥胖预防规划提供基础。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Apr;36(4):524-8. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.263. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
7
Current status of family intervention science.家庭干预科学的现状
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2001 Jul;10(3):641-61.
8
The experiences of overweight female adolescents after health promotion counseling.超重女性青少年在接受健康促进咨询后的经历。
J Nurs Res. 2005 Mar;13(1):41-8.
9
Psychosocial characteristics of obese children/youngsters and their families: implications for preventive and curative interventions.肥胖儿童/青少年及其家庭的心理社会特征:对预防和治疗干预的启示。
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Dec;55(3):353-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.04.005.
10
Obesity, stigma and public health planning.肥胖、污名化与公共卫生规划。
Health Promot Int. 2009 Mar;24(1):88-93. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan041. Epub 2009 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the Science-Practice Gap in Obesity Treatment.弥合肥胖治疗中的科学与实践差距。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2015 Dec 15;10(2):100-103. doi: 10.1177/1559827615620381. eCollection 2016 Mar-Apr.
2
Assessment of Eating Habits and Physical Activity among Spanish Adolescents. The "Cooking and Active Leisure" TAS Program.西班牙青少年饮食习惯与身体活动的评估。“烹饪与积极休闲”TAS项目。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 27;11(7):e0159962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159962. eCollection 2016.