Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1563, USA.
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 7;32(10):3575-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5715-11.2012.
The neural basis of action understanding in humans remains disputed, with some research implicating the putative mirror neuron system (MNS) and some a mentalizing system (MZS) for inferring mental states. The basis for this dispute may be that action understanding is a heterogeneous construct: actions can be understood from sensory information about body movements or from language about action, and with the goal of understanding the implementation ("how") or motive ("why") of an action. Although extant research implicates the MNS in understanding implementation and the MZS in understanding motive, it remains unknown to what extent these systems subserve modality-specific or supramodal functions in action understanding. While undergoing fMRI, 21 volunteers considered the implementation ("How is she doing it?") and motive ("Why is she doing it?") for actions presented in video or text. Bilateral parietal and right frontal areas of the MNS showed a modality-specific association with perceiving actions in videos, while left-hemisphere MNS showed a supramodal association with understanding implementation. Largely left-hemisphere MZS showed a supramodal association with understanding motive; however, connectivity among the MZS and MNS during the inference of motive was modality specific, being significantly stronger when motive was understood from actions in videos compared to text. These results support a tripartite model of MNS and MZS contributions to action understanding, where distinct areas of the MNS contribute to action perception ("perceiving what") and the representation of action implementation ("knowing how"), while the MZS supports an abstract, modality-independent representation of the mental states that explain action performance ("knowing why").
人类动作理解的神经基础仍存在争议,一些研究暗示了假定的镜像神经元系统 (MNS) 和一些用于推断心理状态的心理化系统 (MZS)。这种争议的基础可能是因为动作理解是一个异构的结构:可以从关于身体运动的感觉信息或关于动作的语言来理解动作,并且理解动作的实施(“如何”)或动机(“为什么”)。虽然现有研究暗示 MNS 理解实施,MZS 理解动机,但尚不清楚这些系统在多大程度上在动作理解中支持特定于模态或超模态的功能。在进行 fMRI 时,21 名志愿者考虑了视频或文本中呈现的动作的实施(“她是如何做到的?”)和动机(“她为什么要这样做?”)。MNS 的双侧顶叶和右侧额叶区域表现出与感知视频中动作的特定模态关联,而左侧半球 MNS 则表现出与理解实施的超模态关联。主要位于左侧半球的 MZS 表现出与理解动机的超模态关联;然而,在推理动机时,MZS 和 MNS 之间的连接是特定于模态的,当从视频中的动作而不是文本中理解动机时,连接强度显著增强。这些结果支持了 MNS 和 MZS 对动作理解的三分模型,其中 MNS 的不同区域有助于动作感知(“感知什么”)和动作实施的表示(“知道如何”),而 MZS 则支持对解释动作表现的心理状态的抽象、独立于模态的表示(“知道为什么”)。